Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
coling_2012_discourse_workshop [2012/08/14 13:41] ufal |
coling_2012_discourse_workshop [2012/11/21 11:31] ufal |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== DISCOURSE | + | ===== ADACA Discourse |
==== W1: Advances in discourse analysis and its computational aspects ==== | ==== W1: Advances in discourse analysis and its computational aspects ==== | ||
- | |||
**Workshop general chair:** Eva Hajičová, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic | **Workshop general chair:** Eva Hajičová, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic | ||
**e-mail:** // | **e-mail:** // | ||
+ | **Technical co-organizers: | ||
+ | **Workshop date:** December 15th, 2012 (Saturday) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === News === | ||
+ | November 21st: Please see below a preliminary programme. | ||
=== Brief description of the workshop === | === Brief description of the workshop === | ||
The aim of the workshop is twofold: | The aim of the workshop is twofold: | ||
- | (a) to bring together and to spread an up-to-date information on advanced computationally oriented | + | - **to bring together** and to spread an up-to-date information on advanced computationally oriented studies in discourse analysis, and |
- | studies in discourse analysis, and | + | - **to provoke a discussion** on hot issues in the domain of the study in discourse, especially with respect to modern methodology and to computationally and corpus oriented research and its possible applications. Thus, the workshop may attract a rather broad (and cross-section) audience: those who are just starting their research in the given area will get enough stuff for thought how to proceed, and those who are in an advanced stage of their research will get a stimulating feedback from the floor and the discussion will make it possible for them to sharpen their ideas and plans. |
- | (b) to provoke a discussion on hot issues in the domain of the study in discourse, especially with | + | To fulfil |
- | respect to modern methodology and to computationally and corpus | + | |
- | oriented research and its possible applications. Thus, the workshop | + | |
- | attract a rather broad (and cross-section) audience: those who are just | + | |
- | starting their research in the given area will get enough stuff for | + | |
- | thought how to proceed, and those who are in an advanced stage of their | + | |
- | research will get a stimulating feedback from the floor and the discussion | + | |
- | will make it possible for them to sharpen their ideas and plans. | + | |
- | To fulfil | + | ===Important Dates=== |
- | provide a forum free of the conventional shape of unrelated | + | Please do not forget to **submit |
- | presentations | + | |
+ | September 30th, 2012 (11:59pm Cetral European time, GMT+2): Paper submission deadline | ||
+ | October 31st, 2012: Paper accept/ | ||
+ | November 15th, 2012: Camera ready paper due | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Call for papers === | ||
+ | Both long (up to 14 A5 pages + references) and short papers (up to 8 A5 pages + references) are possible, please follow the instructions for the formats | ||
+ | |||
+ | Submission and reviewing will be online, managed by the START system. The only accepted format of submitted papers is PDF. Submissions must be uploaded | ||
=== The programme of the workshop will contain === | === The programme of the workshop will contain === | ||
- | (i) brief positional | + | - **brief position |
- | given by prominent researchers who have had significant contributions to | + | - **contributions** by workshop participants submitted and accepted (on the basis of a review procedure) |
- | the field (see the list of invited speakers below), and | + | |
+ | We believe that this procedure will help to concentrate on an intensive interaction and discussion of all the participants of the workshop. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===The invitation to present a position paper (with a provisional topics as given below) has already been accepted by=== | ||
+ | **Prof. Kristiina Jokinen,** University of Helsinki, Finland, University of Tartu, Estonia | ||
+ | //New Information in Wikitalk - story telling for information presentation// | ||
+ | **Prof. Aravind Joshi,** University of Pennsylvania, | ||
+ | //Remarks on some not so closed issues concerning discourse connectives// | ||
+ | **Prof. Katheleen McKeown,** Columbia University, New York, USA | ||
+ | //What is needed and what can help for people who want to use discourse relations in tasks such as NL generation or text summarization.// | ||
+ | **Massimo Poesio,** University of Essex, Great Britain | ||
+ | //Empirical methods in the study of anaphora: lessons learned, remaining problems// ([[Poesio_abstract|abstract]]) | ||
- | (ii) contributions | + | === Preliminary Programme === |
- | by workshop participants submitted | + | 9.30 – 9.50: //Welcome, Introduction// |
- | procedure). | + | 9.50 – 10.30: Aravind Joshi: //Remarks on some not so closed issues concerning discourse connectives// |
+ | 10.30 – 10.55: Amba Kulkarni and Monali Das: //Discourse Analysis of Sanskrit texts// | ||
+ | 10.55 – 11.20: Pavlína Jínová, Jiří Mírovský and Lucie Poláková: // | ||
+ | 11.20 – 12.00: TEA BREAK | ||
+ | 12.00 – 12.40: Kathleen McKeown: //Penn Discourse Treebank Relations | ||
+ | 12.40 – 13.05: Nik Adilah Hanin Binti Zahri, Fumiyo Fukumoto and Suguru Matsuyoshi: // | ||
+ | 13.05 – 13.30: Fatemeh Torabi Asr and Vera Demberg: // | ||
+ | 13.30 – 14.30: LUNCH | ||
+ | 14.30 – 15.10: Kristiina Jokinen: //New Information in Wikitalk - story telling for information presentation// | ||
+ | 15.10 – 15.35: Raheel Nawaz, Paul Thompson and Sophia Ananiadou: //Towards event-based discourse analysis of biomedical text// | ||
+ | 15.35 – 16.00: Andreas Peldszus and David Schlangen: // | ||
+ | 16.00 – 16.30: TEA BREAK | ||
+ | 16.30 – 17.10: Massimo Poesio: //Empirical methods in the study of anaphora: lessons learned, remaining problems// (invited position paper) | ||
+ | 17.10 – 18.00: General discussion: //Where we are and where to go// | ||
- | We believe that this procedure will help to concentrate on an intensive | + | === Among the issues proposed |
- | interaction | + | * Intra-sentential |
+ | * Explicit and implicit relations | ||
+ | * What corpora annnotation of discourse relations and related phenomena can reveal? | ||
+ | * Annotation efforts undertaken in languages other than English, and their contribution to advances in Language Technologies and to a greater cross-linguistic understanding of coherence relations, their complexity and their lexicalization. | ||
+ | * Advances in empirically-driven discourse-level methods of language processing (discourse parsing, sense detection) and their impact on theoretical understanding of discourse structure | ||
+ | * Discourse and dialogue, commonalities and differences (e.g. dialogue act standardisation) | ||
+ | * Text segmentation and modelling of coherence in texts, twits, dialogues, monologues etc. | ||
+ | * Structures other than coherence relations that discourse manifests (e.g. layout or " | ||
- | The abstracts of the statements of the invited speakers will be published | ||
- | on this web page before August 31st, 2012. |