[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki


[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
courses:rg:2011-report-parser [2012/09/26 13:49]
ufal
courses:rg:2011-report-parser [2012/09/27 09:41]
ufal
Line 3: Line 3:
 written by Stephen Tratz and Eduard Hovy (Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern Carolina) written by Stephen Tratz and Eduard Hovy (Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern Carolina)
  
-spoken by Martin Popel+presented by Martin Popel
  
 reported by Michal Novák reported by Michal Novák
Line 9: Line 9:
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
  
-The paper describes a high-quality conversion of Penn Treebank to dependency trees. The authors introduce an improved labeled dependency scheme based on the Stanford's one.+The paper describes a high-quality conversion of Penn Treebank to dependency trees. The authors introduce an improved labeled dependency scheme based on the Stanford's one. In addition, they extend the non-directional easy-first first algorithm of Goldberg and Elhadad to support non-projective trees by adding "move" actions inspired by Nivre's swap-based reordering for shift-reduce parsing. Their parser is capable of producing shallow semantic annotations for prepositions, possesives and noun compounds. 
  
 ===== Notes ===== ===== Notes =====
 +
 +==== Dependency conversion structure ====
 +
 +  * in general, there are (at least) 3 possible types of dependency labels:
 +    * unlabeled - is it really a set of labels?
 +    * coarse labels of the CoNLL tasks
 +        * 10-20 labels
 +        * for example NMOD is always under a noun - it's an easy task and the result is not quite useful
 +    * their scheme is based on the Stanford's dependency labels
 +
  

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]