Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
courses:rg:2012:longdtreport [2012/03/12 20:11] longdt vytvořeno |
courses:rg:2012:longdtreport [2012/03/12 22:59] (current) longdt |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Test | + | ====== Faster and Smaller N-Gram Language Model ====== |
+ | //Presenter : Joachim Daiber | ||
+ | Reporter: Long DT// | ||
+ | Date : 12-March-2012\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Overview ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The talk is mainly about techniques to improve performance of N-gram language model. | ||
+ | How it will run faster and use smaller amount of memory. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Encoding ==== | ||
+ | **I. Encoding the count** | ||
+ | |||
+ | In web1T corpus, the most frequent n-gram is 95 billion times, but contain only 770 000 unique count. | ||
+ | => Maintain value rank array is a good way to encode count | ||
+ | |||
+ | **II. Encoding the n-gram** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **// | ||
+ | encode W1,W2....Wn = c(W1, | ||
+ | c is offset function, so call context encoding | ||
+ | |||
+ | **// | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Sorted Array__ | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Use n array for n-gram model (array i-th is used for i-gram) | ||
+ | - Each element in array in pair (w,c) | ||
+ | w : index of that word in unigram array | ||
+ | c : offset pointer | ||
+ | - Sort base on w | ||
+ | |||
+ | Improvement : Implicitly encode W (all n-gram ending with particular word wi are stored -> wasteful. So, maintain another array save the beginning and the end of the range | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Hash Table__ | ||
+ | Use open addressing (with linear probling) | ||
+ | Use extra 40% space for auxiliary part (avoid collision) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **// | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Variable length coding__ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Idea : | ||
+ | Context offset tend to be close with each others, => Only save the first offsets address and the difference of others with the it | ||
+ | |||
+ | Question : | ||
+ | how the unigram be sorted ? | ||
+ | Martin suggest that it must be sorted base on frequency | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Block Compression__ | ||
+ | compress the key/value array in the blocks of 128 bytes, | ||
+ | the underline reason is only to support binary search | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Decoding ==== | ||
+ | **I. Exploiting Repetitive Queries** | ||
+ | |||
+ | The method use cache to speed up the process | ||
+ | This simple implementation increase performance of 300% over conventional implementation | ||
+ | **II. Exploiting Scrolling Queries** | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can quickly form the context encoding of the next query by concatenating new words with saved offset from previous query | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Conclusion ==== | ||
+ | In summary, it was a worth reading paper, well presented, and thoroughly | ||
+ | discussed. Paper contain many detail techniques that definitely helpful for actual implementation. |