Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
courses:rg:2013:jacana-align [2013/11/04 21:20] fiala created |
courses:rg:2013:jacana-align [2013/11/04 22:22] (current) popel |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Slides accompanying the article are located at [[http:// | Slides accompanying the article are located at [[http:// | ||
| - | **1/** Describe parameters of feature function in section 3.1 | + | **1/** Describe parameters of feature function in section 3.1. Is there something unclear in the formula? |
| - | **2/** Section 3.1 describes problem with unknown number of states. | + | **2/** Section 3.1 describes |
| - | For example, we have following source sentence: //" | + | For example, we have the following source sentence: //" |
| - | Target | + | and target |
| - | And tags: NOUN, VERB, ADJ, ADV, PRON, DET, ADP, NUM, CONJ, PRT | + | and tags: NOUN, VERB, ADJ, ADV, PRON, DET, ADP, NUM, CONJ, PRT |
| How many states will be used? | How many states will be used? | ||
| - | **3/** Search WordNet (http:// | + | **3/** Search WordNet (http:// |
| - | **a /** Imagine, that source sentence countains word //"well"// and target //"part"//. | + | |
| - | Find differences with incorporating POS tagger and without it. How big will be gain in number of comparisons (just roughly)? | + | |
| - | **b/** Is there a synset containing both //" | + | |
| - | **4/** Have a look at Table 3. How big was gain from incorporating Wordnet with POS tagger? Would you use two external resources for this gain (refer discussion in section 4.6)? | + | **a/** using POS tagger |
| + | **b/** without | ||
| - | **5/** Why do you think, authors add Hamming distance into first formula in section | + | **4/** Why do you think, |
