[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki


[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:rg:2014:wr [2014/11/04 01:24]
hoangt
courses:rg:2014:wr [2014/11/04 14:41]
popel
Line 8: Line 8:
    dog 11010111010    dog 11010111010
    cat 11010111010    cat 11010111010
-    +2. Section 4.1 defines a corrupted (or noise) n-gram, but there is a tiny error/typo in the definition. Try nitpicking and point it out.
-2. Section 4.1 defines a corrupted (or noise) n-gram, but there is a tiny error/typo in the definition. Try to be nitpicking and point it out.+
  
 3. Section 7.4 states that "word representations in NER brought larger gains on the out-of-domain data than on the in-domain data." Try to guess what is the reason. 3. Section 7.4 states that "word representations in NER brought larger gains on the out-of-domain data than on the in-domain data." Try to guess what is the reason.
Line 17: Line 16:
 b) Does it contain any compound feature with word representations? b) Does it contain any compound feature with word representations?
 c) Give an example of a possible compound feature with word representations for the NER task.  c) Give an example of a possible compound feature with word representations for the NER task. 
 +
 +5.
 +Consider the C&W embedding vectors with 50 dimensions. Guess which word has the embedding vector most similar (by Euclidean distance) to the following vector:
 +a) vector(king) - vector(man) + vector(woman)
 +b) vector(dollars) - vector(dollar) + vector(mouse)
  
 **Hint** : The paper is 11-page long. You can skip section 2 and section 3.2 which are the literature review. **Hint** : The paper is 11-page long. You can skip section 2 and section 3.2 which are the literature review.
  
  

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]