Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
courses:rg:automatic-domain-adaptation-for-parsing1 [2011/09/14 18:31] ramasamy |
courses:rg:automatic-domain-adaptation-for-parsing1 [2011/09/14 18:40] ramasamy |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * It was noted that the parser has been tested across various domains. | * It was noted that the parser has been tested across various domains. | ||
| * Entroy feature was not clear. | * Entroy feature was not clear. | ||
| + | * The idea was to successfully adapt to new domains than to achieve very good accuracy for a particular domain. | ||
| ==== What do we like about the paper: ==== | ==== What do we like about the paper: ==== | ||
| * The multiple source adaptation method can identify the factors which affect the parsing accuracy for texts from different domains. | * The multiple source adaptation method can identify the factors which affect the parsing accuracy for texts from different domains. | ||
| * They successfully included methods for domain detection compared to previous works. | * They successfully included methods for domain detection compared to previous works. | ||
| + | * Inclusion of self trained corpora helped avoiding data sparsity in small corporas. | ||
| ==== What do we dislike about the paper: ==== | ==== What do we dislike about the paper: ==== | ||
| - | | + | |