Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
courses:rg:automatic-domain-adaptation-for-parsing1 [2011/09/14 18:21] ramasamy |
courses:rg:automatic-domain-adaptation-for-parsing1 [2011/09/14 18:50] (current) ramasamy |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Comments by : Loganathan | Comments by : Loganathan | ||
- | ==== Objective ==== | + | ===== Objective ===== |
+ | The objective of the paper is to make the statistical parsers adapting to new domains. Best parsing model for a particular testing data is identified by combining training data(source mixture) from different domains. This source mixture is learned from a regression model which will identify the appropriate parsing model. | ||
===== Comments ===== | ===== Comments ===== | ||
Some of the comments and doubts arised during the discussion | Some of the comments and doubts arised during the discussion | ||
- | * It was asked how the data was collected, mainly due to the size of the data used in training. | + | * It was asked how the data was collected, mainly due to the size of the data used in training. |
- | ==== What do we dislike about the paper: ==== | + | * Training and testing were reported in the development set not on the parsing models. |
+ | * It was noted that the parser has been tested across various domains. | ||
+ | * Entropy feature was not clear. | ||
+ | * The idea was to successfully adapt to new domains than to achieve very good accuracy for a particular domain. | ||
- | + | ===== What do we like about the paper: ===== | |
- | ==== What do we like about the paper: ==== | + | * The multiple source adaptation method can identify the factors which affect the parsing accuracy for texts from different domains. |
+ | * They successfully included methods for domain detection compared to previous works. | ||
+ | * Inclusion of self trained corpora helped avoiding data sparsity in small corporas. | ||
- | + | ===== What do we dislike about the paper: ===== | |
+ | | ||