Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
courses:rg:natural-logic-for-textual-inference [2011/05/03 01:48] gutierrez vytvořeno |
courses:rg:natural-logic-for-textual-inference [2011/05/03 01:52] gutierrez |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Natural Logic for Textual Inference ====== | ||
+ | **Bill MacCartney, Christopher D. Manning (2007)** | ||
+ | |||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
This paper deals with “**natural logic**” which is logical inference that operates over natural language. Usually the approaches for natural language inference are whether robust but shallow or deep but brittle. The system proposed in this paper aims to be in the middle of the existent approaches and avoid, for instance, the error when translating a natural language to 1st order logic. | This paper deals with “**natural logic**” which is logical inference that operates over natural language. Usually the approaches for natural language inference are whether robust but shallow or deep but brittle. The system proposed in this paper aims to be in the middle of the existent approaches and avoid, for instance, the error when translating a natural language to 1st order logic. | ||
- | quantifiers, | + | |
One key concept in the theory of natural logic is “monoticity” in which, instead of using quantifiers, | One key concept in the theory of natural logic is “monoticity” in which, instead of using quantifiers, | ||
Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
*Disadvantage: | *Disadvantage: | ||
*We liked the evaluation presented in the paper and the result' | *We liked the evaluation presented in the paper and the result' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Comments by Ximena Gutiérrez. |