Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
courses:rg:natural-logic-for-textual-inference [2011/05/03 01:49] gutierrez |
courses:rg:natural-logic-for-textual-inference [2011/05/03 01:52] gutierrez |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Natural Logic for Textual Inference ====== | ||
| + | **Bill MacCartney, Christopher D. Manning (2007)** | ||
| + | |||
| ===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
| This paper deals with “**natural logic**” which is logical inference that operates over natural language. Usually the approaches for natural language inference are whether robust but shallow or deep but brittle. The system proposed in this paper aims to be in the middle of the existent approaches and avoid, for instance, the error when translating a natural language to 1st order logic. | This paper deals with “**natural logic**” which is logical inference that operates over natural language. Usually the approaches for natural language inference are whether robust but shallow or deep but brittle. The system proposed in this paper aims to be in the middle of the existent approaches and avoid, for instance, the error when translating a natural language to 1st order logic. | ||
| - | quantifiers, | + | |
| One key concept in the theory of natural logic is “monoticity” in which, instead of using quantifiers, | One key concept in the theory of natural logic is “monoticity” in which, instead of using quantifiers, | ||