[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

[ Back to the navigation ]

You are here: start » courses » rg » natural-logic-for-textual-inference

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
courses:rg:natural-logic-for-textual-inference [2011/05/03 01:56]
gutierrez 		courses:rg:natural-logic-for-textual-inference [2011/05/03 02:01]
gutierrez
Line 25: Line 25:
   *It is good that the examples in test data contain 3 different answers.   *It is good that the examples in test data contain 3 different answers.
   *Disadvantage: If you combine a lot of atomic edits, the probability of getting the right answer is lower.   *Disadvantage: If you combine a lot of atomic edits, the probability of getting the right answer is lower.
-  *We liked the evaluation presented in the paper and the result' s interpretation (that is not very usual in semantics). Also it was good the fact that they digitalized a textbook of formal semantics to build the testsuit FraCaS +  *We liked the evaluation presented in the paper and the results interpretation (that is not very usual in semantics). Also it was good the fact that they digitalized a textbook of formal semantics to build the testsuit FraCaS 
  
  
  
 Written by Ximena Gutiérrez. Written by Ximena Gutiérrez.

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]