[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki


[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
courses:rg:overcoming_vocabulary_sparsity_in_mt_using_lattices [2010/11/30 11:21]
popel my comments
courses:rg:overcoming_vocabulary_sparsity_in_mt_using_lattices [2011/01/09 19:43] (current)
kirschner
Line 25: Line 25:
  
 The strong side of the proposed approaches is that these techniques work for large training data. The strong side of the proposed approaches is that these techniques work for large training data.
 +
 +==== Remarks by Martin Kirschner ====
 +  * The experiments and evaluation are done on Arabic-English translation pair.
 +  * Section 2 of the paper: //Many of the above works use morphological toolkits, while in this work we explore lightweight techniques that use the parallel data as the main source of information. We are able to combine both linguistic and statistical sources knowledge and then train the system to select which information it will use at decoding time.// - What is the difference between morphological toolkits and linguistic and statistical sources of knowledge? Is it the reason why the don't use lemmatizer (as mentioned above), to do the work mork lightweight?
  
 ===== Challenge 1 ===== ===== Challenge 1 =====
Line 76: Line 80:
 They can work with prefixes b-, l-, Al- and k- using similar approach as for w- prefix. They can work with prefixes b-, l-, Al- and k- using similar approach as for w- prefix.
 They can look at the context for spelling correction. They can look at the context for spelling correction.
-  
  

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]