This is an old revision of the document!
Table of Contents
Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns
Tom M. Mitchell, Svetlana V. Shinkareva, Andrew Carlson, Kai-Min Chang, Vicente L. Malave, Robert A. Mason, Marcel Adam Just
Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns
Comments
Summary
- authors present a computational model, which predicts the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of neural activation associated with words for which no fMRI data are available
- fMRI prediction for a word
w
is a two-step process:- compute a vector of semantic features over a huge corpus
- 25 features are defined in terms of co-occurrence of
w
with forms of 25 manually selected sensory-motor verbs
- predict neural fMRI activation as a weighted sum of semantic features
- weights for every voxel (3D pixel) and feature are estimated using multiple regression
- fMRI data
- they created 60 representative fMRI images
- word - picture combination from 12 semantic categories
- they measured brain activation of 9 participants after being exposed to all 60 word - picture combinations
- evaluation
- they carried out “leave-two-out” cross validation with all 60 examples
- 58 of them served as a training data
- for two of them fMRI images were predicted and compared with observed images. On the basis of cosine similarity measure a matching was determined. If the predicted image for the first word matches with its corresponding observed image, one positive point is scored - aggregated over all folds, it forms an accuracy measure
- experiments and results
- quantitative measurment
- matching two unseen words to their seen fMRI images
- 0.77 averaged over all 9 participants - significantly above a chance level
- higher activation tends to be predicted in the left hemisphere - it is consistent with the generally held view that left hemisphere is more responsible for semantic representation than the right one
- prediction for a word in a new semantic category
- in training stage, they excluded all examples from the same semantic category as either of the two tested words
- 0.70 averaged over all 9 participants - still above the chance level
- prediction, when two tested words belong to the same category
- hard to distinguish
- 0.62 averaged over all participants - slightly above the chance level
- ability to distinguish in even more diverse range of words
- model trained on 59 examples and tested on a remaining example + another 1000 highly frequent words
- it ranked predicted fMRI images for 1001 words with respect to its similarity to observed fMRI image of the testing example
- 0.72 over 9 participants
What do we like about the paper
What do we dislike about the paper
- authors selected 25 sensory-motor verbs as a basis for their co-occurence features. But they did not sufficiently explain what led them to pick exactly these ones.
Written by Michal Novák