Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
courses:rg:shooting_at_flies_in_the_dark [2010/11/15 19:06] klic |
courses:rg:shooting_at_flies_in_the_dark [2011/01/09 23:24] kirschner |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===== Pluses ===== | ===== Pluses ===== | ||
* All the resources and source codes are downloadable. | * All the resources and source codes are downloadable. | ||
+ | * Grammar rules of the minority languages (which can be dying out) are formalised and thus preserved. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | > Many real-world examples from discussed languages make the understanding of the paper easier. -MK- | ||
===== Minuses ===== | ===== Minuses ===== | ||
Line 12: | Line 15: | ||
===== Questions ==== | ===== Questions ==== | ||
+ | - Where does the semantic information come from? Is it from manual annotation? | ||
+ | - Assimilation vs. dissemination. Does it make a difference when we design an MT system? \\ In a statistical system probably not. In a rule based system, there may be an effort to make the errors predictable and the output easily post-editable when our aim is dissemination. | ||
+ | - What is the difference between a minority language and an underresourced language? \\ We guess that a minority language is a language with a small number of users. There are underresourced languages which can be considered major, like Indonesian. |