[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

[ Back to the navigation ]

You are here: start » courses » rg » wishlist

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
courses:rg:wishlist [2012/10/23 15:37]
popel 		courses:rg:wishlist [2013/02/18 16:15]
korvas Added a few pointers to papers on language and vision
Line 23: Line 23:
      * John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, Fernando Pereira: [[http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~pereira/papers/crf.pdf|Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data]], 2001      * John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, Fernando Pereira: [[http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~pereira/papers/crf.pdf|Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data]], 2001
      * Sunita Sarawagi, William Cohen: [[http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wcohen/postscript/semiCRF.pdf|Semi-Markov conditional random fields for information extraction]], Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004      * Sunita Sarawagi, William Cohen: [[http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~wcohen/postscript/semiCRF.pdf|Semi-Markov conditional random fields for information extraction]], Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004
 +     * Malte Nuhn, Arne Mauser, Hermann Ney: [[http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/publications/download/777/NuhnMalteMauserArneNeyHermann--DecipheringForeignLanguagebyCombiningLanguageModelsContextVectors--2012.pdf|Deciphering Foreign Language by Combining Language Models and Context Vectors]], 2012.
  
  
Line 37: Line 38:
 ==== MT Evaluation ==== ==== MT Evaluation ====
   * Martin Popel would appreciate two RG meetings devoted to significance tests & MT evaluation. The two presenters should together read the following 4 papers (and related ones) and select two for presenting (one on bootstrap, one on approximate randomization).   * Martin Popel would appreciate two RG meetings devoted to significance tests & MT evaluation. The two presenters should together read the following 4 papers (and related ones) and select two for presenting (one on bootstrap, one on approximate randomization).
-    - Stefan Riezler and John T. Maxwell III: [[http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W05/W05-0908.pdf|On Some Pitfalls in Automatic Evaluation and Significance Testing for MT]] (page 67) ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation, 2005.+    - <del>Stefan Riezler and John T. Maxwell III: [[http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W05/W05-0908.pdf|On Some Pitfalls in Automatic Evaluation and Significance Testing for MT]] (page 67) ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation, 2005.</del>
     - Nicolas Stroppa, Karolina Owczarzak, Andy Way: [[http://doras.dcu.ie/15227/1/stroppa_owczarzak_07.pdf|A Cluster-Based Representation for Multi-System MT Evaluation]], 2007.     - Nicolas Stroppa, Karolina Owczarzak, Andy Way: [[http://doras.dcu.ie/15227/1/stroppa_owczarzak_07.pdf|A Cluster-Based Representation for Multi-System MT Evaluation]], 2007.
     - <del>Philipp Koehn: [[http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/acl2004/emnlp/pdf/Koehn.pdf|Statistical significance tests for machine translation evaluation]], EMNLP 2004.</del>     - <del>Philipp Koehn: [[http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/acl2004/emnlp/pdf/Koehn.pdf|Statistical significance tests for machine translation evaluation]], EMNLP 2004.</del>
Line 46: Line 47:
   * Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, Uri Simonsohn: [[http://people.psych.cornell.edu/~jec7/pcd%20pubs/simmonsetal11.pdf|False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant]], Psychological Science, 2011. Yes, it is a psychological paper, but it is very valuable for anyone doing/reading any evaluation with significance tests.   * Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, Uri Simonsohn: [[http://people.psych.cornell.edu/~jec7/pcd%20pubs/simmonsetal11.pdf|False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant]], Psychological Science, 2011. Yes, it is a psychological paper, but it is very valuable for anyone doing/reading any evaluation with significance tests.
  
 +==== Language and Vision ====
 +  * Yansong Feng, Mirella Lapata: [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/N/N10/N10-1125.pdf|Topic Models for Image Annotation and Text Illustration]]
 +  * Farhadi, Hejrati, Sadeghi, Young: [[http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~afarhadi/papers/sentence.pdf|Every Picture Tells a Story: Generating Sentences from Images]]
 +  * Kojima, Tamura: [[http://www.cs.ucf.edu/courses/cap6412/2001/kojima.pdf|Natural Language Description of Human Activities from Video Images Based on Concept Hierarchy of Actions]]
 +  * Rohrbach, Regneri et al.: [[http://www.d2.mpi-inf.mpg.de/sites/default/files/rohrbach12eccv.pdf|Script Data for Attribute-based Recognition of Composite Activities]]
 +
 +==== Unsupervised Approach to Morphology and Parsing ====
 +
 +(TODO add some papers here :-))
  
 ==== Other ==== ==== Other ====
Line 59: Line 69:
    * [[http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/|ACL archive]],I recommend trying the [[http://aclasb.dfki.de/|ACL Searchbench]]    * [[http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/|ACL archive]],I recommend trying the [[http://aclasb.dfki.de/|ACL Searchbench]]
    * [[http://scholar.google.com]]    * [[http://scholar.google.com]]
 +

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]