Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
draft [2009/07/15 15:26] ptacek |
draft [2009/07/16 09:49] ptacek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
+ | ====== Description of Czech Companion November Demonstrator ====== | ||
- | ====== Description of Czech Companion November Prototype ====== | + | The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; however the set of modules |
- | + | ||
- | The Czech version of Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; | + | |
- | however the set of modules | + | |
- | + | ||
- | photopal domena, nahranej korpus, ze na to sou dafy (reusing SHEFF DM intergrated through Inamode Relayer (TID)) vhodny, moreover reusable for expected pomdp DM from UOX (reuse states, let pomdp' | + | |
- | typy odpovedi a zpusob jejich implementace, | + | |
- | NLP server s tectomt, ASR/TTS/SR client, connected over network | + | |
- | XXX JPta | + | |
- | + | ||
- | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | + | |
- | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' | + | |
+ | The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype), we supply the transition network (DAFs). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature package within time frame that allows for integration, | ||
+ | Our DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, | ||
+ | {{user: | ||
Line 32: | Line 24: | ||
- | ===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.1 ???) ===== | + | |
+ | ===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | ||
performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 42: | Line 37: | ||
===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger | + | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger |
performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 49: | Line 46: | ||
features: induce dependencies and labels | features: induce dependencies and labels | ||
performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
- | v tipu je natrenovat MacDonnalda na dialog datech, ten task je do M42, ted ne. | + | |
Line 55: | Line 52: | ||
===== Semantic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Semantic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: | + | features: |
- | performance indicator: accuracy | + | performance indicator: accuracy |
===== Information Extraction (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Information Extraction (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
Line 62: | Line 59: | ||
covering predicates from before-mentioned set of DAFs. | covering predicates from before-mentioned set of DAFs. | ||
performance indicator: accuracy | performance indicator: accuracy | ||
+ | |||
===== Named Entities Recognition (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Named Entities Recognition (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: detect person names, geographical locations | + | features: detect person names, geographical locations, organization names |
performance indicator: f-measure | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== Dialog Act Tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Dialog Act Tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: | + | features: |
performance indicator: accuracy | performance indicator: accuracy | ||
- | ===== Sentiment Analysis (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: za tohle bych vydaval klasifikator, | ||
- | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
Line 82: | Line 80: | ||
- | ===== Complete System Evaluation | + | |
- | T5.2.7 tohle zminuje, nick webb to pro nas asi neudela | + | ===== Dialog Manager (WP 5.3) ===== |
- | performance indicator: number | + | features: integrated DAF-based dialog manager from previous English prototype, |
+ | manual creation | ||
+ | performance indicator: acceptability | ||
- | ===== Dialog Manager (WP 5.3) ===== | ||
- | features: reply types, using (language independed) predicates (prakticky to znamena, ze pojmenuju testy na prechodech v dafech anglicky) | ||
- | Handmade DAF covering following topics: Person_Retired, | ||
- | performance indicator: rucni hodnoceni prijatelnosti vybrane akce | ||
===== Natural Language Generation (WP 5.4) ===== | ===== Natural Language Generation (WP 5.4) ===== | ||
- | features: | + | features: |
performance indicator: BLEU score | performance indicator: BLEU score | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Emotional TTS (WP 5.5) ===== | ||
+ | features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes | ||
+ | performance indicator: listening tests | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Emotional Avatar Integration (WP 5.5) ===== | ||
+ | features: new Czech female voice with affective features will be integrated with the TID avatar | ||
+ | performance indicator: subjective evaluation of the naturalness and the ability to convey emotions (small-scale, | ||
+ |