Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
draft [2009/07/15 15:39] ptacek |
draft [2009/07/15 16:20] ptacek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The Czech version of Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; | The Czech version of Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; | ||
however the set of modules differs (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings: the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR,TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | however the set of modules differs (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings: the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR,TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{user: | ||
photopal domena, nahranej korpus, ze na to sou dafy (reusing SHEFF DM intergrated through Inamode Relayer (TID)) vhodny, moreover reusable for expected pomdp DM from UOX (reuse states, let pomdp' | photopal domena, nahranej korpus, ze na to sou dafy (reusing SHEFF DM intergrated through Inamode Relayer (TID)) vhodny, moreover reusable for expected pomdp DM from UOX (reuse states, let pomdp' | ||
Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
NLP server s tectomt, ASR/TTS/SR client, connected over network | NLP server s tectomt, ASR/TTS/SR client, connected over network | ||
XXX JPta | XXX JPta | ||
- | |||
- | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | ||
- | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' | ||
- | |||
- | |||
Line 44: | Line 41: | ||
features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger (XXX prida nam Jarka OOV slova co najdeme, bude PDTSC rucne oznackovane - do listopadu?) | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger (XXX prida nam Jarka OOV slova co najdeme, bude PDTSC rucne oznackovane - do listopadu?) | ||
performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
features: induce dependencies and labels | features: induce dependencies and labels | ||
performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
- | v tipu je natrenovat MacDonnalda na dialog datech, ten task je do M42, ted ne. | ||
Line 78: | Line 76: | ||
- | ===== Sentiment Analysis (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: za tohle bych vydaval klasifikator, | ||
- | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
Line 87: | Line 82: | ||
+ | ===== Dialog Manager (WP 5.3) ===== | ||
+ | features: integrated DAF-based dialog manager from previous English prototype, | ||
+ | manual creation of DAFs covering following topics: Person_retired, | ||
+ | performance indicator: acceptability - manual evaluation of actions selected by DM | ||
- | ===== Dialog Manager (WP 5.3) ===== | ||
- | features: reply types, using (language independed) predicates (prakticky to znamena, ze pojmenuju testy na prechodech v dafech anglicky) | ||
- | Handmade DAF covering following topics: Person_Retired, | ||
- | performance indicator: rucni hodnoceni prijatelnosti vybrane akce | ||
+ | ===== Natural Language Generation (WP 5.4) ===== | ||
+ | features: adding of functional words, morphological adjustments, | ||
+ | performance indicator: BLEU score | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== AZ PO LISTOPADU ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
+ | features: adapted to domain (McD trained on manual PDTSC trees) | ||
+ | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Sentiment Analysis (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
+ | features: za tohle bych vydaval klasifikator, | ||
+ | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
- | AZ PO LISTOPADU: | ||
===== Complete System Evaluation ===== | ===== Complete System Evaluation ===== | ||
T5.2.7 tohle zminuje, nick webb to pro nas asi neudela | T5.2.7 tohle zminuje, nick webb to pro nas asi neudela | ||
Line 103: | Line 112: | ||
+ | ===== advances ===== | ||
- | + | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(?) rucne anotovat pos, a-tree, t-tree, IE predicates, Named Entities, DA pro eval in-domain testy after Nov. | |
- | + | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' | |
- | ===== Natural Language Generation | + | |
- | features: variations, underspecified input (dott format), emotional markup (natvrdo v dafech | + | |
- | performance indicator: BLEU score | + |