Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
draft [2009/07/15 15:44] ptacek |
draft [2009/07/16 09:48] ptacek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
- | ====== Description of Czech Companion November Prototype ====== | ||
- | The Czech version of Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; | ||
- | however the set of modules differs (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings: the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR,TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | ||
- | photopal domena, nahranej korpus, ze na to sou dafy (reusing SHEFF DM intergrated through Inamode Relayer (TID)) vhodny, moreover reusable for expected pomdp DM from UOX (reuse states, let pomdp' | + | ====== Description of Czech Companion November Demonstrator ====== |
- | typy odpovedi a zpusob jejich implementace, | + | |
- | NLP server s tectomt, ASR/TTS/SR client, connected over network | + | |
- | XXX JPta | + | |
- | + | ||
- | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | + | |
- | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' | + | |
+ | The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; however the set of modules is different (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings, the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by a local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR, TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | ||
+ | The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype), we supply the transition network (DAFs). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature package within time frame that allows for integration, | ||
+ | Our DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, | ||
+ | {{user: | ||
Line 32: | Line 27: | ||
- | ===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.1 ???) ===== | + | |
+ | ===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | ||
performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 42: | Line 40: | ||
===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger | + | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger |
performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
features: induce dependencies and labels | features: induce dependencies and labels | ||
performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
- | v tipu je natrenovat MacDonnalda na dialog datech, ten task je do M42, ted ne. | ||
Line 56: | Line 55: | ||
===== Semantic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Semantic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: assignment of semantic roles (69 roles), coordinations, | + | features: assignment of semantic roles (69 roles), coordinations, |
performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
Line 67: | Line 66: | ||
===== Named Entities Recognition (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Named Entities Recognition (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: detect person names, geographical locations, | + | features: detect person names, geographical locations, |
performance indicator: f-measure | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
Line 74: | Line 73: | ||
===== Dialog Act Tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Dialog Act Tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: domain tailored | + | features: domain tailored |
performance indicator: accuracy | performance indicator: accuracy | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== Dialog Manager (WP 5.3) ===== | ===== Dialog Manager (WP 5.3) ===== | ||
- | features: | + | features: |
- | Handmade DAF covering following topics: | + | manual creation of DAFs covering following topics: |
- | performance indicator: | + | performance indicator: |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
===== Natural Language Generation (WP 5.4) ===== | ===== Natural Language Generation (WP 5.4) ===== | ||
- | features: | + | features: |
performance indicator: BLEU score | performance indicator: BLEU score | ||
- | ====== AZ PO LISTOPADU ====== | ||
- | ===== Complete System Evaluation | + | ===== Emotional TTS (WP 5.5) ===== |
- | T5.2.7 tohle zminuje, nick webb to pro nas asi neudela | + | features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes |
- | performance indicator: | + | performance indicator: |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Emotional Avatar Integration (WP 5.5) ===== | ||
+ | features: new Czech female voice with affective features will be integrated with the TID avatar | ||
+ | performance indicator: subjective evaluation | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | --------------cut here---------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== AZ PO LISTOPADU (NENI SOUCASTI ZPRAVY PRO PO) ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
+ | features: adapted to domain (McD trained on manual PDTSC trees) | ||
+ | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
===== Sentiment Analysis (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Sentiment Analysis (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
Line 99: | Line 125: | ||
performance indicator: f-measure | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
+ | ===== Complete System Evaluation ===== | ||
+ | T5.2.7 tohle zminuje, nick webb to pro nas asi neudela | ||
+ | performance indicator: number of tokens in user reply utterances, post-session questionare | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== advances ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | ||
+ | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' |