Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
draft [2009/07/15 16:20] ptacek |
draft [2009/07/16 09:14] ptacek |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
- | ====== Description of Czech Companion November Prototype ====== | ||
- | The Czech version of Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; | ||
- | however the set of modules differs (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings: the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR,TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | ||
- | {{user: | + | ====== Description of Czech Companion November Demonstrator ====== |
- | photopal domena, nahranej korpus, ze na to sou dafy (reusing SHEFF DM intergrated | + | The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating |
- | typy odpovedi | + | |
- | NLP server s tectomt, ASR/TTS/SR client, connected over network | + | |
- | XXX JPta | + | |
+ | The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype), we supply the transition network (DAFs). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature package within time frame that allows for integration, | ||
+ | Our DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{user: | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
- | ===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.1 ???) ===== | + | |
+ | ===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | ||
performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | ||
+ | |||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger (XXX prida nam Jarka OOV slova co najdeme, bude PDTSC rucne oznackovane - do listopadu?) | + | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger |
performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
===== Semantic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Semantic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: assignment of semantic roles (69 roles), coordinations, | + | features: assignment of semantic roles (69 roles), coordinations, |
performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
===== Named Entities Recognition (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Named Entities Recognition (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: detect person names, geographical locations, | + | features: detect person names, geographical locations, |
performance indicator: f-measure | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
===== Dialog Act Tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Dialog Act Tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
- | features: domain tailored | + | features: domain tailored |
performance indicator: accuracy | performance indicator: accuracy | ||
+ | |||
Line 86: | Line 87: | ||
manual creation of DAFs covering following topics: Person_retired, | manual creation of DAFs covering following topics: Person_retired, | ||
performance indicator: acceptability - manual evaluation of actions selected by DM | performance indicator: acceptability - manual evaluation of actions selected by DM | ||
+ | |||
Line 96: | Line 98: | ||
- | ====== AZ PO LISTOPADU ====== | + | |
+ | ===== Emotional TTS (WP 5.5) ===== | ||
+ | features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes | ||
+ | performance indicator: listening tests | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Emotional Avatar Integration (WP 5.5) ===== | ||
+ | features: new Czech female voice with affective features will be integrated with the TID avatar | ||
+ | performance indicator: subjective evaluation of the naturalness and the ability to convey emotions (small-scale, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | --------------cut here---------------- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== AZ PO LISTOPADU | ||
===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
Line 115: | Line 132: | ||
advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | ||
- | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' | + | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' |