[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

[ Back to the navigation ]

You are here: start » draft

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
draft [2009/07/15 23:34]
ptacek 		draft [2009/07/15 23:56]
ptacek
Line 12: Line 12:
 The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature enough package within time frame that allows for integration, (c) possibility of reusing DAF states, tests and specified actions for the upcoming statistical DM by UOXF (however this is post November work). The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature enough package within time frame that allows for integration, (c) possibility of reusing DAF states, tests and specified actions for the upcoming statistical DM by UOXF (however this is post November work).
  
-DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessment statements, remarks and glosses to provide longer system utterances in order to encourage user to tell more.+DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, remarks and glosses to provide longer system utterances in order to encourage user to tell more.
  
-{{user:ptacek:czech_companion_diagram.png.jpg|}}+{{user:ptacek:companion-diagram-nov.png|}}
  
  
Line 26: Line 26:
  
  
-===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.1 **???**) =====+ 
 +===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.2) =====
 features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, and corrections, polish word ordering features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, and corrections, polish word ordering
 performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings
Line 125: Line 126:
  
 advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(?) rucne anotovat pos, a-tree, t-tree, IE predicates, Named Entities, DA pro eval in-domain testy after Nov. advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(?) rucne anotovat pos, a-tree, t-tree, IE predicates, Named Entities, DA pro eval in-domain testy after Nov.
-pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat 'jen' kde je rozdil ve forme?{{user:ptacek:czech_companion_diagram.png.jpg|}}+pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat 'jen' kde je rozdil ve forme?

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]