[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

[ Back to the navigation ]

You are here: start » draft

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
draft [2009/07/15 23:35]
ptacek 		draft [2009/07/16 09:48]
ptacek
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 [[Progress Report]] - dal jsem to na zvlastni stranku, abysme si nelezli do zeli [[Progress Report]] - dal jsem to na zvlastni stranku, abysme si nelezli do zeli
 +
  
  
Line 10: Line 11:
 The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; however the set of modules is different (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings, the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by a local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR, TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; however the set of modules is different (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings, the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by a local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR, TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server.
  
-The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature enough package within time frame that allows for integration, (c) possibility of reusing DAF states, tests and specified actions for the upcoming statistical DM by UOXF (however this is post November work).+The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype), we supply the transition network (DAFs). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature package within time frame that allows for integration, (c) possibility of reusing created DAF states, tests and specified actions for the upcoming statistical DM by UOXF (however this is post November work).
  
-DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, remarks and glosses to provide longer system utterances in order to encourage user to tell more.+Our DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, remarks and glosses to provide longer system utterances in order to encourage user to tell more.
  
-{{user:ptacek:czech_companion_diagram.png.jpg|}}+{{user:ptacek:czech_companion_diagram.png|}}
  
  
Line 26: Line 27:
  
  
-===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.1 **???**) =====+ 
 +===== Speech Reconstruction (WP 5.2) =====
 features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, and corrections, polish word ordering features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, and corrections, polish word ordering
 performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings
 +
 +
  
  
Line 36: Line 40:
  
 ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) =====
-features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger **(XXX prida nam Jarka OOV slova co najdeme - Mirek uz vyrabi list, bude PDTSC rucne oznackovane - do listopadu?)**+features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger
 performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy
  
Line 99: Line 103:
 features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes
 performance indicator: listening tests  performance indicator: listening tests 
 +
  
  
Line 106: Line 111:
    
  
-====== AZ PO LISTOPADU ======+ 
 +--------------cut here---------------- 
 + 
 +====== AZ PO LISTOPADU (NENI SOUCASTI ZPRAVY PRO PO) ======
  
 ===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== ===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) =====
Line 125: Line 133:
  
 advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(?) rucne anotovat pos, a-tree, t-tree, IE predicates, Named Entities, DA pro eval in-domain testy after Nov. advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(?) rucne anotovat pos, a-tree, t-tree, IE predicates, Named Entities, DA pro eval in-domain testy after Nov.
-pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat 'jen' kde je rozdil ve forme?{{user:ptacek:czech_companion_diagram.png.jpg|}}+pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat 'jen' kde je rozdil ve forme?

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]