Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
draft [2009/07/15 23:56] ptacek |
draft [2009/07/16 09:50] ptacek |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| [[Progress Report]] - dal jsem to na zvlastni stranku, abysme si nelezli do zeli | [[Progress Report]] - dal jsem to na zvlastni stranku, abysme si nelezli do zeli | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
| The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; however the set of modules is different (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings, the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by a local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR, TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | The Czech version of the Companion deals with the Reminiscing about User's Photos scenario, taking advantage of data recorded in first phase of the project. The basic architecture is same as of the English version, i.e. set of modules communicating through the Inamode Relayer (TID) backbone; however the set of modules is different (see Figure 1). Regarding the physical settings, the Czech version runs on two notebook computers connected by a local network; one can be seen as a Speech Client, running modules dealing with ASR, TTS and ECA, second as an NLP Server. | ||
| - | The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature | + | The dialog is driven by a dialog manager component by USFD (originally developed for the English Senior Companion prototype), we supply the transition network (DAFs). The selection is backed by (a) appropriateness for the type of dialog we aim for (the corpus reveals frequent reoccurring topics to be handled by DAFs) , (b) availability of mature package within time frame that allows for integration, |
| - | DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, | + | Our DAFs covering selected topics contain not only Companion replies mined from the corpora, but also new human-authored assessments, |
| - | {{user: | + | {{user: |
| Line 30: | Line 28: | ||
| features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | features: omit filler phrases, remove irrelevant speech events, handle false starts, repetitions, | ||
| performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | performance indicator: BLEU score between actual output and manually reconstructed sentences from corpora (T5.2.1), baseline: Moses with default settings | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ===== Morphology Analyzer and POS tagging (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
| - | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger | + | features: coverage of photo-pal domain, domain adapted tagger |
| performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | performance indicator: OOV rate, accuracy | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes | features: emotions will be expressed implicitly, through the usage of communicative functions; new female voice database was recorded for this purposes | ||
| performance indicator: listening tests | performance indicator: listening tests | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| Line 105: | Line 107: | ||
| features: new Czech female voice with affective features will be integrated with the TID avatar | features: new Czech female voice with affective features will be integrated with the TID avatar | ||
| performance indicator: subjective evaluation of the naturalness and the ability to convey emotions (small-scale, | performance indicator: subjective evaluation of the naturalness and the ability to convey emotions (small-scale, | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ====== AZ PO LISTOPADU ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Syntactic Parsing (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
| - | features: adapted to domain (McD trained on manual PDTSC trees) | ||
| - | performance indicator: accuracy (correctly induced edges, labels) | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Sentiment Analysis (WP 5.2) ===== | ||
| - | features: za tohle bych vydaval klasifikator, | ||
| - | performance indicator: f-measure | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Complete System Evaluation ===== | ||
| - | T5.2.7 tohle zminuje, nick webb to pro nas asi neudela | ||
| - | performance indicator: number of tokens in user reply utterances, post-session questionare | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | ===== advances ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | advances in Czech NLU (on reconstructed spoken data): 300-500vet(? | ||
| - | pos ? analyzovat, generovat a kontrolovat ' | ||