https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/ 2026-05-06T17:25:41+00:00 https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/ https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/lib/tpl/ufal/images/favicon.ico text/html 2007-10-02T18:49:38+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:aff?rev=1191343778&do=diff AFF: Affected Object Definition: (e AFF o) expresses the relation between an event e and an object o affected by e in such a way that o is changed. o is immediately acted upon by e. Examples: The contracts doubled the company revenue. text/html 2007-10-10T15:55:31+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:agt?rev=1192024531&do=diff AGT: Agent Definition: The expression (e AGT o) characterizes the relation between an event(e), or an action(e) and a conceptual object o, which actively causes e Example: o is originating/sustaining/giving rise to e. The relation AGT is also extended to states, where (s AGT o) means that the object o actively sustains the state s. text/html 2006-12-08T08:47:30+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:anlg?rev=1165564050&do=diff ANLG: Similarity between Entities The relationship (g ANLG a) expresses the similarity of the elements of a whole class g of objects with regard to the attribute a. text/html 2007-10-02T18:52:26+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:ante?rev=1191343946&do=diff ANTE: Temporal Succession Definition: In the case of t1 and t2 being temporal moments or periods (or, in technical terms, t1, t2 ∈ t), the expression (t1 ANTE t2) states that t1 lies temporally before t2 or is preceding t2. The relation ANTE is extended to sort text/html 2006-12-08T08:48:22+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:anto?rev=1165564102&do=diff ANTO: Antonymy Definition: The statement (s1 ANTO s2) connects two concepts of the same sort which represent a pair of opposites belonging to the same conceptual field. The relation ANTO is superordinate to the relations: COMPL, CONTR and CNVRS. It is symmetric and not reflexive (and therefore also not transitive). text/html 2006-12-08T08:50:38+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:assoc?rev=1165564238&do=diff ASSOC: Association Definition: The expression (e1 ASSOC e2) states that there is a cognitive connection (an association) between the two arguments e1 and e2 which is not further specified. It originates, at least in principle, from a deeper semantic relationship (even if this connection is not resolved and explicitly represented in the SN). The relation text/html 2007-10-02T19:00:09+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:attch?rev=1191344409&do=diff ATTCH: Object Attachment Definition: The assertion (o1 ATTCH o2) indicates that the object o1 is immanently or situationally attached to the object o2 . A specific connection ATTCH between two objects may, but need not necessarily be symmetric. Examples text/html 2007-03-05T08:48:00+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:attr?rev=1173080880&do=diff ATTR: Assignment of Attributes to Objects Definition: The relationship (o ATTR m) specifies that m is a characteristic attribute or a particular trait of o. Examples: The color of the car is red. [:projects:content-annotation:relations:exprop2.png] ---------- The same fact can be also expressed using a property as in this sentence: text/html 2007-10-02T19:26:42+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:avrt?rev=1191346002&do=diff AVRT: Averting from an Object Definition: The expression (e AVRT o) specifies the relation between an event e and an object o participating in e from which the action dominating e is averting or turning away. Example: IBM left the market. text/html 2006-12-08T09:00:10+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:benf?rev=1165564810&do=diff BENF: Beneficiary Definition: The assertion (s BENF b) allows for a specification of the beneficiary b of a situation s ∈ si or of an object s ∈ o. In the case s ∈ si, b is usually not immediately participating in s (which is typically an event) and is also not changed by text/html 2006-12-08T13:03:48+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:caus?rev=1165579428&do=diff CAUS: Causality, Relation Between Cause and Effect Definition: The statement (s1 CAUS s2) indicates that the situation s1 (which must be real) is the cause for the situation s2 (which must also be real). s2 is the effect actually brought about by text/html 2007-04-10T08:43:49+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:chea?rev=1176187429&do=diff CHEA: Sortal Change: Event – Abstract Concept Definition: The statement (e CHEA a) expresses the connection between an event e ∈ dy and an abstract concept a ∈ ad which agree, at least partially, in their meaning. Concepts connected by CHEA correspond to each other in a systematic way. text/html 2007-04-10T08:46:31+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:chpa?rev=1176187591&do=diff CHPA: Sortal Change: Property – Abstract Concept Definition: The statement (p CHPA c) establishes a connection between a property p and an abstract concept (an abstract property or attribute) c which is semantically close to p and whose meaning is systematically related to p. text/html 2007-04-10T08:48:16+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:chpe?rev=1176187696&do=diff CHPE: Sortal Change: Property – Event Definition: The relation (p CHPE v) establishes a connection between a property p in the broadest sense and an event v, where v is a process characterizing the emergence of p. text/html 2007-04-10T08:49:57+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:chps?rev=1176187797&do=diff CHPS: Sortal Change: Property – State Definition: The relationship (p CHPS s) is used for the characterization of state, expressing that the state s is determined essentially by the property p. text/html 2007-04-10T08:52:01+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:chsa?rev=1176187921&do=diff CHSA: Sortal Change: State – Abstract State Definition: The assertion (s1 CHSA s2 ) connects a state s1 with an abstract conceptual object s2 ; the meanings of these states are systematically interrelated and partially overlapping, although both concepts are designated differently in the surface structure. Specifically, s1 is typically described by a stat verb in the surface structure, and s2 by a corresponding abstract noun. text/html 2006-12-08T13:12:22+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:circ?rev=1165579942&do=diff CIRC: Relation Between a Situation and a Concomitant Situation Definition: The relation (s1 CIRC s2) specifies the connection between a situation s1 and an accompanying circumstance or concomitant situation s2. text/html 2006-12-08T13:15:02+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:conc?rev=1165580102&do=diff CONC: Relation Expressing a Concession Definition: The assertion (s1 CONC s2) indicates that the situation s1 holds in spite of the circumstance s2, which seemingly opposes s1. text/html 2006-12-08T13:16:26+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:cond?rev=1165580186&do=diff COND: Conditional Relation Definition: The relation (s1 COND s2) specifies that s1 is a sufficient condition for situation s2. If s2 is an event, then s1 activates the occurrence of s2. In contrast to the relation IMPL, the relation COND is not transitive. text/html 2006-12-08T13:17:58+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:conf?rev=1165580278&do=diff CONF: Relation Expressing the Conformity with an Abstract Frame Definition: The assertion (s CONF f) specifies an outer abstract frame f to which the situation s conforms, or according to which an event proceeds. This frame may be a plan, a rule, a law, an agreement, a general situation, etc. text/html 2006-12-08T13:20:12+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:corr?rev=1165580412&do=diff CORR: Qualitative or Quantitative Correspondence Definition: The expression (e1 CORR e2) is used to specify a qualitative or quantitative correspondence of two entities, e1 and e2, or a mutual assignment in a more general framework comprising both of these entities. The relation text/html 2007-10-02T18:51:12+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:cstr?rev=1191343872&do=diff CSTR: Causator Definition: (s CSTR o) expresses the relationship between a situation s (typically an event) and that object o which gives rise to s or which has to be seen as the causator (originator) of s. Examples: The contracts doubled the company revenue. text/html 2007-10-04T18:32:48+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:ctxt?rev=1191515568&do=diff CTXT: Relation Specifying a Restricting Context Definition: The expression (s CTXT c) is used to restrict the persistence or validity of a situation s to a certain context c ∈ {o ∪ si}. In contrast to CIRC, the relation CTXT has a semantically restrictive character. text/html 2007-10-02T20:15:38+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:dircl?rev=1191348938&do=diff DIRCL: Local Destination or Direction Definition: The relation (e DIRCL l) is used primarily to specify a local goal l, or the direction l of an event e, or of its carrier action, where the goal is marked by a location or by the position of an object. In a broader sense, it is also possible to specify local goals or spatial directions for objects and for states or physical quantities (see below). Thus, the sorts text/html 2006-12-08T13:34:04+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:distg?rev=1165581244&do=diff DISTG: Specifying a Difference Definition: The assertion (g DISTG a) specifies the distinctness of a whole class g of objects with regard to the attribute a. In this way, it represents a multitude of relations, each stating a distinction between another pair of elements of text/html 2006-12-08T13:35:58+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:dpnd?rev=1165581358&do=diff DPND: Dependency Relation Definition: The relation (e1 DPND e2) characterizes the extensional e1 as dependent on the extensional e2. The relation DPND is not symmetric and not reflexive. text/html 2007-10-02T20:16:51+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:dur?rev=1191349011&do=diff DUR: Temporal Extension Definition: The expression (s DUR t) specifies the duration t or temporal continuance of an event s, or the period of time t when a state s persists. In connection with objects, it is used to specify the duration of existence. text/html 2006-12-08T13:51:02+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:elmt?rev=1165582262&do=diff ELMT: Element Relation Definition: The statement (e ELMT g) indicates that the entity e is a member of the collection g, i.e. ELMT corresponds to the element relation of naive set theory. Consequently, g ∈ pe(n+1) must be a set (preextensional entity) of order text/html 2007-04-09T09:28:07+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:equ?rev=1176103687&do=diff EQU: Equivalence Definition: The expression (e1 EQU e2) states that the entities e1 and e2 are intensionally equal. The relation is symmetric, reflexive and transitive (i.e. it is an equivalence relation). Company is equal to Fujitsu ltd. text/html 2006-12-08T13:54:14+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:exp?rev=1165582454&do=diff EXP: Experiencer of an Event Definition: The expression (s EXP o) states that the object o experiences the situation s (usually an event), where o does not actively carry out s. Although o is directly involved in the situation s, it is not physically changed by text/html 2006-12-08T13:56:50+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:fin?rev=1165582610&do=diff FIN: Temporal End Definition: The expression (s FIN e) states that e marks the temporal end of s. If the second argument e of (s FIN e) represents a situation (i.e. e ∈ si), then the temporal end of s is identified with the beginning of the time interval text/html 2007-01-10T10:17:12+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:goal?rev=1168420632&do=diff GOAL: Generalized Goal Definition: The expression (s GOAL g) specifies that the object g is the general aim or goal of s, where s is typically a situation. The relation GOAL is superordinate to the relations DIRCL, PURP, and – to a certain extent – to the relation text/html 2006-12-08T14:00:32+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:hsit?rev=1165582832&do=diff HSIT: Constituents of a Hypersituation Definition: The expression (s1 HSIT s2) states that the situation s2 is a constituent of the hypersituation s1. The more comprehensive situation s1 is just defined by the fact that it is composed of more than one elementary situation, among them text/html 2006-12-08T14:02:44+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:impl?rev=1165582964&do=diff IMPL: Implication Relation Between Situations Definition: The assertion (s1 IMPL s2) expresses that the situation or concept s1 implies the situation or the concept s2 on a purely conceptual level, i.e. IMPL represents an analytical relation of conclusion based only on the intensional meaning of the arguments indicated. The connection between the cognitive roles of the concepts participating in the description of the arguments text/html 2006-12-08T14:04:02+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:init?rev=1165583042&do=diff INIT: Initial Situation or Entity Definition: The assertion (e INIT s) establishes a connection between an event e and an initial situation (typically a state) s which is encountered immediately before e starts. The initial situation s can also be characterized, for short, by an object if this object is changed by text/html 2007-04-07T11:41:30+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:instr?rev=1175938890&do=diff INSTR: Instrument Definition: The statement (s INSTR o) establishes a connection between a situation s (typically an action) and the instrument o, which is used to carry out s (in the case of an event) or to sustain s (in the case of a state). text/html 2006-12-08T14:14:44+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:just?rev=1165583684&do=diff JUST: Justification of a Situation Definition: The relationship (s1 JUST s2) states that s1 is an ethical justification or a socially conventionalized reason for the situation (state of affairs) s2. In other words, s1 is the social justification for text/html 2006-12-08T14:16:10+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:lext?rev=1165583770&do=diff LEXT: Relation Specifying a Local Extent Definition: The assertion (o LEXT l) specifies the local/spatial extent l of a situation or of an object o without referring to a local origin or local end. text/html 2007-10-02T20:17:54+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:loc?rev=1191349074&do=diff LOC: Location of a Situation Definition: The assertion (s LOC l) specifies that the object s ∈ o is at place l, or that the situation s ∈ si holds at location l, or – if the situation is an event – it is taking place at l. Example: The train to Baltimore was standing at the station for the whole night. text/html 2006-12-08T14:33:24+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:maj?rev=1165584804&do=diff MAJ: Greater than Definition: The statement (q1 MAJ q2) expresses that the number or quantity q1 exceeds the number or quantity q2. See also MAJE. text/html 2006-12-08T14:33:12+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:maje?rev=1165584792&do=diff MAJE: Greater than or Equal to Definition: The relation MAJE, expressing the relationship “greater than or equal to” is defined analogously to the relation MAJ. text/html 2007-04-07T11:44:22+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:mannr?rev=1175939062&do=diff MANNR: Specifying the Manner Definition: The expression (s MANNR m) is used for a more detailed characterization or qualitative specification of an event or a state s by defining the manner m in which the event is carried out or the state persists. text/html 2007-04-07T09:57:47+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:mcont?rev=1175932667&do=diff MCONT: Relation Between a Mental Process and Its Content Definition: The expression (s MCONT c) permits a specification of the informational or mental content c of a mental or informational process s. The relation MCONT is also used to represent the informational or mental content of the result of such a process (e.g. a writing process), which motivates this shorthand notation. By default, the second argument text/html 2006-12-08T14:37:54+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:mero?rev=1165585074&do=diff MERO: Meronymy Relation Definition: The expression (o1 MERO o2) states that o1 is a part of o2 in a very general sense. MERO is defined as a generalization of the relations PARS, ORIGM, ELMT, SUBM, and TEMP comprising all partonymic relationships. text/html 2006-12-08T14:39:16+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:meth?rev=1165585156&do=diff METH: Method Definition: The expression (s METH m) describes the connection between a situation s (typically an event) and an abstract object or event m representing the method by which s is carried out (in the case of an event s) or by which s is sustained (in the case of a state text/html 2007-04-07T11:51:56+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:mexp?rev=1175939516&do=diff MEXP: Mental Experiencer Definition: (s MEXP o) specifies the relationship between a mental process or state s and an animate object o which is experiencing s. text/html 2006-12-08T14:42:24+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:min?rev=1165585344&do=diff MIN: Smaller than Definition: The statement (q1 MIN q2) expresses that the number or quantity q1 is smaller than the number or quantity q2. See also MINE. text/html 2006-12-08T14:43:30+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:mine?rev=1165585410&do=diff MINE: Smaller than or Equal to Definition: The relation MINE denoting the relationship “smaller than or equal to” is defined analogously to MIN. text/html 2006-12-08T14:48:06+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:mode?rev=1165585686&do=diff MODE: Generalized Mode of a Situation Definition: The expression (s MODE m) specifies a generalized manner m after which an event s is carried out or a state s is sustained. It comprises the relations MANNR, METH, and INSTR. text/html 2007-03-25T13:22:16+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:modl?rev=1174821736&do=diff MODL: Modality of a Situation Definition: The expression (s MODL m) is used to restrict the meaning of a situation s by means of a modal operator m from a finite set md. It represents the attitude of a speaker or author of a situational description with regard to the validity of the sentences formulated by him or her. text/html 2007-04-07T09:29:33+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:obj?rev=1175930973&do=diff OBJ: Neutral Object as Participant Definition: The assertion (s OBJ b) represents the connection between a situation s and an object b that is independent of s. b is actually involved in the situation s (generally an event), but it is neither physically changed (in contrast to text/html 2006-12-08T14:55:52+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:oppos?rev=1165586152&do=diff OPPOS: Opposition Definition: The statement (s OPPOS e) describes an antagonism between s and e, an opposition of s to e, or a force s conflicting with e, i.e. the situation s (generally an event) or the corresponding carrier of s (generally an agent) opposes text/html 2006-12-08T14:57:04+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:orig?rev=1165586224&do=diff ORIG: Mental or Informational Origin Definition: The statement (o1 ORIG o2) is used to represent the connection between an object o1 and its informational or mental source o2. text/html 2006-12-08T14:58:22+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:origl?rev=1165586302&do=diff ORIGL: Local Origin Definition: For e ∈ si the assertion (e ORIGL l) specifies the local origin or starting point l of the event e. It is also used for the specification of the local origin of a conceptual object if the latter has a direction as a meaning component, or if it is text/html 2006-12-08T14:59:50+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:origm?rev=1165586390&do=diff ORIGM: Material Origin Definition: The expression (o1 ORIGM o2) specifies the material origin of o1 from o2 , i.e. o1 has partially or wholly been created by a process of transformation or production from o2. The relation ORIGM is restrictedly transitive. text/html 2007-10-04T22:20:23+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:ornt?rev=1191529223&do=diff ORNT: Orientation to an Object Definition: The expression (s ORNT o) specifies the connection between a situation s (typically an event) and an object o directly involved in the situation s and toward which the situation is directed. The object o is not changed. text/html 2006-12-08T15:02:54+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:pars?rev=1165586574&do=diff PARS: Relation Between Part and Whole Definition: The expression (o1 PARS o2) specifies that o1 is a part of o2; in other words, o2 is the whole which contains o1 as its component. The relation PARS is restrictedly transitive, asymmetric, and not reflexive. text/html 2007-10-02T18:21:59+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:poss?rev=1191342119&do=diff POSS: Possession Definition: The statement (o1 POSS o2) expresses the connection between an owner o1, who is usually a human or a legal person, and its possession o2, which o1 has at his disposal. Example: Fred's car is red. text/html 2007-04-09T09:25:25+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:prop?rev=1176103525&do=diff PROP: Relation Between Object and Property Definition: The assertion (o PROP p) establishes a connection between an object o and a property p, which, by definition, is not a relational or functional quality. International trade. The trade being international is a property of the trade. text/html 2007-10-04T16:57:11+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:propr?rev=1191509831&do=diff PROPR: Relation Between a Plurality and a Semantically Relational Property Definition: The expression (g PROPR r) is used to characterize a plurality g by means of a semantically relational quality r. Examples: The bids were comparable. Notes: text/html 2006-12-08T15:09:16+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:purp?rev=1165586956&do=diff PURP: Purpose Definition: The assertion (s PURP p) expresses that the situation or object s has the purpose or aim p. text/html 2006-12-08T15:10:40+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:qmod?rev=1165587040&do=diff QMOD: Quantitative Modification Definition: The expression (d QMOD q) is used to specify a certain amount of a substance or of a collection of objects d by modifying it with a quantity q. text/html 2007-10-04T18:37:26+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:quant?rev=1191515846&do=diff QUANT: Quantity Definition: a number or amount examples: quantifiers: most, all, several, 16, 15km, 5ºF some success in trade diplomacy text/html 2006-12-08T15:12:18+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:reas?rev=1165587138&do=diff REAS: General Reason for a Situation Definition: The statement (s1 REAS s2) indicates a general reason or general grounds, which can be explicated either causally (CAUS), logically (IMPL), or by social norms (JUST). s1 is the reason for s2. text/html 2007-04-07T11:52:58+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:rprs?rev=1175939578&do=diff RPRS: Representational Form or Manifestation of an Object Definition: The expression (o1 RPRS o2) specifies that o1 appears in the representational form or manifestation o2. text/html 2007-04-07T10:08:26+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:rslt?rev=1175933306&do=diff RSLT: Result Definition: The statement (s RSLT r) establishes a semantic connection between a situation s (typically an event) and its result r. text/html 2007-10-02T20:18:47+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:scar?rev=1191349127&do=diff SCAR: Carrier of a State (Passive) Definition: The assertion (s SCAR o) connects a nonmental state s to an object o which is in this state, or which carries this state without playing an active role in it. Examples: The plane costs $3 million. text/html 2006-12-08T15:26:06+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:setof?rev=1165587966&do=diff SETOF: Relation Between Plurality and Governing Predicative Concept Definition: The statement (g SETOF c) establishes the connection between a set g, i.e. an entity of the preextensional level, and a generic concept c, meaning that all elements of text/html 2006-12-08T15:27:44+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:situ?rev=1165588064&do=diff SITU: Situational Embedding or Abstract Location Definition: The assertion (s1 SITU s2) expresses the situational embedding or abstract location s2 of an object or situation s1. text/html 2006-12-08T15:43:08+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:sourc?rev=1165588988&do=diff SOURC: Generalized Source or Origin Definition: The statement (s SOURC q) expresses that the object s has the generalized source q, where s is typically an event. SOURC is defined as the union of the relations INIT, ORIG, ORIGL, ORIGM, and AVRT. text/html 2007-10-02T18:18:48+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:sspe?rev=1191341928&do=diff SSPE: Entity Specifying a State Definition: (s SSPE e) characterizes the relationship between a state s and an entity e which participates in s without being the carrier of this state. From a logical point of view, e is an essential meaning component of the predicate determining text/html 2007-04-07T09:42:48+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:strt?rev=1175931768&do=diff STRT: Temporal Beginning Definition: The expression (s STRT t) states that the temporal beginning of an event s or the beginning of the validity of a state of affairs s is determined by the second argument t, which can be another situation, a moment, or a period of time. If the second argument of the expression text/html 2006-12-08T15:49:20+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:sub?rev=1165589360&do=diff SUB: Subordination of Concepts Representing Objects Definition: The expression (o1 SUB o2) specifies that the individual or generic concept o1 is subordinate to the generic concept o2, i.e. everything derivable for o2 is also valid for o1. The relation text/html 2006-12-08T15:53:36+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:sub0?rev=1165589616&do=diff SUB0: Generalized Subordination Definition: The assertion (e1 SUB0 e2) describes the most general conceptual subordination. It is defined as a union of the relations SUB, SUBS, and SUBR, i.e. the following holds: (e1 SUB0 e2 ) ←→ Def (e1 SUB e2 ) ∨ (e1 SUBS e2 ) ∨ (e1 SUBR e2 ) text/html 2006-12-08T15:57:56+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:subm?rev=1165589876&do=diff SUBM Subsumption of Sets (Set Inclusion) Definition: The statement (g1 SUBM g2) specifies that the collection/set g1 is completely contained in, but is not identical to, the collection/set g2. This relation is transitive, asymmetric, and not reflexive. The reflexive relation text/html 2006-12-08T16:00:24+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:subme?rev=1165590024&do=diff SUBME Subsumption of Sets (Set Inclusion) Definition: The reflexive relation SUBME expressing set inclusion or equality is defined analogously to SUBM. text/html 2006-12-08T16:03:26+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:subs?rev=1165590206&do=diff SUBS: Subordination of Situations Definition: The statement (s1 SUBS s2) characterizes the subordination of concepts which represent situations (actions, happenings, or states) where the second argument s2 must always be a generic concept. The relation text/html 2006-12-08T16:08:42+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:subst?rev=1165590522&do=diff SUBST: Substitute for an Entity Definition: The expression (x SUBST y) states that x instead of y participates in a situation, or that an object x is substituted for another object y in an event, or that a situation x holds instead of a situation y text/html 2006-12-08T16:11:44+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:suppl?rev=1165590704&do=diff SUPPL: Supplement Definition: The assertion (s SUPPL o) expresses that o supplements the situational concept s in the sense that o is an essential meaning component of s. In contrast to the relation OBJ, the existence or validity of o is closely tied to that of text/html 2007-02-20T15:34:30+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:temp?rev=1171982070&do=diff TEMP: Temporal Frame Definition: The assertion (s TEMP t) expresses that the situation s holds within the time interval t (or, if s is an event, that it occurs within t). If the first argument is of sort o, then the second argument specifies the time interval or moment when text/html 2006-12-08T16:14:56+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:val?rev=1165590896&do=diff VAL: Relation Between Attribute and Value Definition: The statement (a VAL v) establishes a connection between an attribute that is assigned to a certain individual object o (see ATTR) and a concept v, the value of this attribute with regard to o. text/html 2006-12-08T16:24:04+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://wiki.ufal.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects:content-annotation:relations:via?rev=1165591444&do=diff VIA: Spatial Path Definition: The assertion (s VIA w) is used for the specification of a path or way w taken by an object s ∈ d participating in an event or of a path determining the spatial route of an event s ∈ [dy ∪ ad].