[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki


[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
jokinen_abstract [2012/11/08 13:37]
ufal
jokinen_abstract [2012/11/08 13:42] (current)
ufal
Line 1: Line 1:
-**Kristiina Jokinen, University of**+**Kristiina Jokinen, University of Helsinki, University of Tartu**
 //New Information in Wikitalk - story telling for information presentation//​ //New Information in Wikitalk - story telling for information presentation//​
  
-In this talk I will discuss issues related to information presentation in an interactive system, +In this talk I will discuss issues related to information presentation in an interactive system, Wikitalk (Wilcock & Jokinen, 2011). This supports open-domain conversations using Wikipedia as a knowledge base, and it has been implemented on Nao a spoken dialogue system. The novel feature in the system is that by extending the robot’s interaction capabilities by enabling Nao to talk about an unlimited range of topics.
-Wikitalk (Wilcock & Jokinen, 2011). This supports open-domain conversations using Wikipedia +
-as a knowledge base, and it has been implemented on Nao a spoken dialogue system. The novel +
-feature in the system is that by extending the robot’s interaction capabilities by enabling Nao to +
-talk about an unlimited range of topics.+
  
-I will focus especially on how to present new information in a manner that allows the user to +I will focus especially on how to present new information in a manner that allows the user to follow the presentation. The user can query Wikipedia via the Nao robot and have chosen entries read out by the robot. In a text-free environment the user needs to infer the structure of the article from the robot’s output - Wikipedia entries are large blocks of text which can be very monotonous when simply read out by a synthetic voice, and comprehension could be enhanced by adding non-verbal cues to discourse level organization of the text. In Wikipedia relevant information is marked with hyperlinks to other entries. A system where the robot could signal these links non-verbally while reading the text would allow the user to further query the encyclopedia without recourse to explicit menus.
-follow the presentation. The user can query Wikipedia via the Nao robot and have chosen entries +
-read out by the robot. In a text-free environment the user needs to infer the structure of the article +
-from the robot’s output - Wikipedia entries are large blocks of text which can be very +
-monotonous when simply read out by a synthetic voice, and comprehension could be enhanced +
-by adding non-verbal cues to discourse level organization of the text. In Wikipedia relevant +
-information is marked with hyperlinks to other entries. A system where the robot could signal +
-these links non-verbally while reading the text would allow the user to further query the +
-encyclopedia without recourse to explicit menus.+
  
-The articles are considered as possible Topics that the robot can talk about, while each link in the +The articles are considered as possible Topics that the robot can talk about, while each link in the article is treated as new information that the user can shift their attention to, and ask for more information. The paragraphs and sentences in the article are considered as propositional chunks, i.e. pieces of information that structure the topic into subtopics and form the minimal units for presentation,​ i.e. they can be presented in one '​utterance'​ by the robot.
-article is treated as new information that the user can shift their attention to, and ask for more +
-information. The paragraphs and sentences in the article are considered as propositional chunks, +
-i.e. pieces of information that structure the topic into subtopics and form the minimal units for +
-presentation,​ i.e. they can be presented in one '​utterance'​ by the robot.+
  
-The challenge in presenting the Wikipedia information is how to convey its structure to the user +The challenge in presenting the Wikipedia information is how to convey its structure to the user so that she can understand which are the new information links, and how to navigate in the topic structure smoothly. In dialogue management, topics are usually managed by a stack, which allows a convenient last-in-first-out mechanism to handle topics that have been recently talked about. We use topic trees (cf. McCoy and Cheng 1990, Jokinen et al. 1996) in which topics are structured into a tree that enables more flexible management of the recent topics.
-so that she can understand which are the new information links, and how to navigate in the topic +
-structure smoothly. In dialogue management, topics are usually managed by a stack, which +
-allows a convenient last-in-first-out mechanism to handle topics that have been recently talked +
-about. We use topic trees (cf. McCoy and Cheng 1990, Jokinen et al. 1996) in which topics are +
-structured into a tree that enables more flexible management of the recent topics.+
  
-Moreover, we use the concepts of Topic and NewInfo (Jokinen 2009) where Topic refers to the +Moreover, we use the concepts of Topic and NewInfo (Jokinen 2009) where Topic refers to the particular issue (Wiki-article) that the speakers are talking about, and NewInfo is the part of the message that is new in the context of the current Topic (links). It must be emphasized that the dialogue coherence, i.e. the relation between consecutive utterances being such that the listener can readily understand what their connection is, appears straightforward:​ we can rely on the structure of the Wikipedia to provide coherence for us. As the Wikipedia articles have already been written so that they form a coherent text, we take advantage of this and assume that the content of the topics and possible NewInfo links is coherent. Meaningfulness of the interaction is based on the user's interest rather than a particular task structure that would limit the suitable topics for the interaction.
-particular issue (Wiki-article) that the speakers are talking about, and NewInfo is the part of the +
-message that is new in the context of the current Topic (links). It must be emphasized that the +
-dialogue coherence, i.e. the relation between consecutive utterances being such that the listener +
-can readily understand what their connection is, appears straightforward:​ we can rely on the +
-structure of the Wikipedia to provide coherence for us. As the Wikipedia articles have already +
-been written so that they form a coherent text, we take advantage of this and assume that the +
-content of the topics and possible NewInfo links is coherent. Meaningfulness of the interaction is +
-based on the user's interest rather than a particular task structure that would limit the suitable +
-topics for the interaction.+
  
-However, what is important in our case is to capture the speakers'​ attentional state in such a way +However, what is important in our case is to capture the speakers'​ attentional state in such a way that the user can focus their attention to NewInfo. We have experimented with various gestures to mark the NewInfo and to provide structuring for the WikiTalk presentation. Gesture and posture changes could also be used to help manage turntaking in Nao’s dialogue, while the inclusion of gesture in Nao’s conversational repertoire would also enhance expressivity and add liveliness to the interaction. We identified a set of gestures which could be used to:
-that the user can focus their attention to NewInfo. We have experimented with various gestures to +
-mark the NewInfo and to provide structuring for the WikiTalk presentation. Gesture and posture +
-changes could also be used to help manage turntaking in Nao’s dialogue, while the inclusion of +
-gesture in Nao’s conversational repertoire would also enhance expressivity and add liveliness to +
-the interaction. We identified a set of gestures which could be used to:+
  
 • Mark discourse level details such as paragraph and sentence boundaries. • Mark discourse level details such as paragraph and sentence boundaries.
Line 54: Line 19:
 • Add expressivity or liveliness • Add expressivity or liveliness
  
-KEYWORDS: discourse and dialogue structuring,​ topic trees, new information,​ Wikipedia, +KEYWORDS: discourse and dialogue structuring,​ topic trees, new information,​ Wikipedia, feedback, turn-taking
-feedback, turn-taking+

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]