[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

• ÚFAL Wiki Home
• ÚFAL Home
• Sitemap
• RSS
• ÚFAL calendar
• Recent changes
• Login
• Hledat:

[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

View differences: Side by SideInline Go

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision 2009/03/01 17:21 hladka 2009/02/26 13:19 hladka 2009/02/26 13:18 hladka 2009/02/26 13:12 hladka 2009/02/26 12:50 hladka 2009/02/26 12:49 hladka 2009/02/26 12:45 hladka 2009/02/26 12:40 hladka 2009/02/26 12:16 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:13 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:03 hladka 2009/02/26 12:02 hladka 2009/02/26 12:01 hladka 2009/02/26 11:57 hladka 2009/02/26 11:56 hladka 2009/02/26 11:52 hladka 2009/02/26 11:49 hladka 2009/02/26 09:54 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:43 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:42 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:40 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:30 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:29 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:21 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:07 mirovsky 2009/02/26 08:39 mirovsky 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:30 hladka 2009/02/25 22:29 hladka 2009/02/25 22:25 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:23 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:20 hladka 2009/02/25 22:19 hladka 2009/02/25 22:17 hladka 2009/02/25 22:11 hladka 2009/02/25 22:10 hladka 2009/02/25 22:07 hladka 2009/02/25 21:58 hladka 2009/02/25 21:52 hladka 2009/02/25 21:51 hladka Go Next revision		Previous revision 2009/03/01 17:23 hladka 2009/03/01 17:23 hladka 2009/03/01 17:21 hladka 2009/02/26 13:19 hladka 2009/02/26 13:18 hladka 2009/02/26 13:12 hladka 2009/02/26 12:50 hladka 2009/02/26 12:49 hladka 2009/02/26 12:45 hladka 2009/02/26 12:40 hladka 2009/02/26 12:16 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:13 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:03 hladka 2009/02/26 12:02 hladka 2009/02/26 12:01 hladka 2009/02/26 11:57 hladka 2009/02/26 11:56 hladka 2009/02/26 11:52 hladka 2009/02/26 11:49 hladka 2009/02/26 09:54 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:43 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:42 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:40 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:30 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:29 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:21 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:07 mirovsky 2009/02/26 08:39 mirovsky 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:30 hladka 2009/02/25 22:29 hladka 2009/02/25 22:25 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:23 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:20 hladka 2009/02/25 22:19 hladka 2009/02/25 22:17 hladka 2009/02/25 22:11 hladka 2009/02/25 22:10 hladka 2009/02/25 22:07 hladka 2009/02/25 21:58 hladka Go Next revision Both sides next revision
user:hladka:playcoref [2009/02/26 09:42] mirovsky		user:hladka:playcoref [2009/02/26 09:54] mirovsky
Line 120:		Line 120:
	// w1 by mela byt nejvyssi; w2 by mela urcite nejak zohlednit uspesnost automaticke procedury - uspesnost merenou na jakych datech?; w3: kdyz hracum budeme zobrazovat i ta slova, ktera oznacil protihrac, a ja je neoznacila, nebudeme je tim tlacit do vynucene shody? pro to, aby w3 bylo 'rozumne', bych zobrazovala pouze dvojice, na kterych se oba hraci shodli.//		// w1 by mela byt nejvyssi; w2 by mela urcite nejak zohlednit uspesnost automaticke procedury - uspesnost merenou na jakych datech?; w3: kdyz hracum budeme zobrazovat i ta slova, ktera oznacil protihrac, a ja je neoznacila, nebudeme je tim tlacit do vynucene shody? pro to, aby w3 bylo 'rozumne', bych zobrazovala pouze dvojice, na kterych se oba hraci shodli.//
-	JM: Já myslím, že do shody je tlačit chceme. Je žádoucí, aby anotace byla co nejúplnější. Když druhý hráč uvidí, že první hráč spojil nějaké slovo, vyvíjí to na něj tlak, aby se podíval, jestli to	+	JM:
		+
		+	Já myslím, že do shody je tlačit chceme. Je žádoucí, aby anotace byla co nejúplnější. Když druhý hráč uvidí, že první hráč spojil nějaké slovo, vyvíjí to na něj tlak, aby se podíval, jestli to
	nepřehlédl a jestli by ho nemohl zapojit také. Neukazuje se mu kam, takže když nenajde žádný cíl, nezapojí ho a bude se radovat, že první hráč udělal nějakou chybu.		nepřehlédl a jestli by ho nemohl zapojit také. Neukazuje se mu kam, takže když nenajde žádný cíl, nezapojí ho a bude se radovat, že první hráč udělal nějakou chybu.
Line 135:		Line 137:
	* number of corrections by player_A and by player_B (JM: I do not see the point in this)		* number of corrections by player_A and by player_B (JM: I do not see the point in this)
	* corrections by player_A and by player_B (JM: and maybe nor in this)		* corrections by player_A and by player_B (JM: and maybe nor in this)
-
	===== Design =====		===== Design =====
Line 141:		Line 142:
	* session time = elapsed time + remaining time		* session time = elapsed time + remaining time
	* how many sentences my partner has read so far		* how many sentences my partner has read so far
-	* running pts **???????**	+	* running pts **???????** (JM: I would be very cautious with this; the user might be tempted to cancel an action if the score decreases; the user might also try to fit the automatic annotation (by trying various arrows and watching if the score goes up or down), which is not what we want)
		+	* Format of the text
		+	* JM: nouns and pronouns might be displayed slightly differently so that the user avoids other parts of speech easily; he should not be allowed to use other parts of speech at all
	* Visualization of the coreference pairs		* Visualization of the coreference pairs
	* colors		* colors
-	* arrows	+	* arrows (JM: to avoid too many arrows on the screen, possibly only if the mouse pointer hovers over a word, arrows that start or end at the word would be displayed)
	* ...		* ...

---

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]