[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

• ÚFAL Wiki Home
• ÚFAL Home
• Sitemap
• RSS
• ÚFAL calendar
• Recent changes
• Login
• Hledat:

[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

View differences: Side by SideInline Go

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision 2009/03/01 17:42 hladka 2009/03/01 17:42 hladka 2009/03/01 17:26 hladka 2009/03/01 17:24 hladka 2009/03/01 17:24 hladka 2009/03/01 17:23 hladka 2009/03/01 17:23 hladka 2009/03/01 17:21 hladka 2009/02/26 13:19 hladka 2009/02/26 13:18 hladka 2009/02/26 13:12 hladka 2009/02/26 12:50 hladka 2009/02/26 12:49 hladka 2009/02/26 12:45 hladka 2009/02/26 12:40 hladka 2009/02/26 12:16 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:13 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:03 hladka 2009/02/26 12:02 hladka 2009/02/26 12:01 hladka 2009/02/26 11:57 hladka 2009/02/26 11:56 hladka 2009/02/26 11:52 hladka 2009/02/26 11:49 hladka 2009/02/26 09:54 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:43 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:42 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:40 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:30 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:29 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:21 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:07 mirovsky 2009/02/26 08:39 mirovsky 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:30 hladka 2009/02/25 22:29 hladka 2009/02/25 22:25 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:23 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:20 hladka 2009/02/25 22:19 hladka Go Next revision		Previous revision 2009/03/02 08:38 mirovsky 2009/03/02 08:37 mirovsky 2009/03/01 17:42 hladka 2009/03/01 17:42 hladka 2009/03/01 17:26 hladka 2009/03/01 17:24 hladka 2009/03/01 17:24 hladka 2009/03/01 17:23 hladka 2009/03/01 17:23 hladka 2009/03/01 17:21 hladka 2009/02/26 13:19 hladka 2009/02/26 13:18 hladka 2009/02/26 13:12 hladka 2009/02/26 12:50 hladka 2009/02/26 12:49 hladka 2009/02/26 12:45 hladka 2009/02/26 12:40 hladka 2009/02/26 12:16 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:15 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:14 hladka 2009/02/26 12:13 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:11 hladka 2009/02/26 12:03 hladka 2009/02/26 12:02 hladka 2009/02/26 12:01 hladka 2009/02/26 11:57 hladka 2009/02/26 11:56 hladka 2009/02/26 11:52 hladka 2009/02/26 11:49 hladka 2009/02/26 09:54 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:43 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:42 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:40 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:30 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:29 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:21 mirovsky 2009/02/26 09:07 mirovsky 2009/02/26 08:39 mirovsky 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:34 hladka 2009/02/25 22:30 hladka 2009/02/25 22:29 hladka 2009/02/25 22:25 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:24 hladka 2009/02/25 22:23 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka 2009/02/25 22:22 hladka Go Next revision Both sides next revision
user:hladka:playcoref [2009/02/26 12:01] hladka		user:hladka:playcoref [2009/02/26 12:03] hladka
Line 91:		Line 91:
	- POS tagger		- POS tagger
	- coreference resolution procedure		- coreference resolution procedure
		+
Line 100:		Line 101:
	* CS data ^JM^		* CS data ^JM^
	* Anja's data    ## // PDT data that are currently being annotated for the extended coreference //		* Anja's data    ## // PDT data that are currently being annotated for the extended coreference //
-	* more 'user-friendly' texts    ## // texts that are currently in the LGame db//
	* **^JM^**: It would be nice if the players could choose a domain of the texts to play on (science-fiction, fantasy, thriller, romance, ...), maybe even the author or the very title. The available resources of free electronic books in Czech are scarce but there are plenty of free electronic books in English and other languages, e.g. [[http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page|Project Gutenberg]]. **^BH^**: It is a very nice idea but I would postpone it till the next versions of the PlayCoref game. However, we have already selected more 'user-friendly' texts into the LGame db - see [[http://ufallab2.ms.mff.cuni.cz/lgame/|this page]]. So we can use them for the PlayCoref game as well.		* **^JM^**: It would be nice if the players could choose a domain of the texts to play on (science-fiction, fantasy, thriller, romance, ...), maybe even the author or the very title. The available resources of free electronic books in Czech are scarce but there are plenty of free electronic books in English and other languages, e.g. [[http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page|Project Gutenberg]]. **^BH^**: It is a very nice idea but I would postpone it till the next versions of the PlayCoref game. However, we have already selected more 'user-friendly' texts into the LGame db - see [[http://ufallab2.ms.mff.cuni.cz/lgame/|this page]]. So we can use them for the PlayCoref game as well.
	* **EN**		* **EN**
Line 128:		Line 128:
	Myslím, že ta funkce by měla brát **buď** automatickou anotaci **nebo** manuální, podle toho, co je k dispozici. Rovněž si teď myslím, že manuálně anotovaná data budeme používat minimálně - pouze pro změření úspěšnosti anotace pomocí hry - to ale nemusí být vůbec součástí skóre hry, to se udělá off-line. Manuálně anotovaných dat máme málo, jsou už anotovaná a nejsou zábavná. Z toho mi vyplývá, že bych manuální anotaci pro určování skóre nebral vůbec v úvahu a ze vzorečku nahoře bych první člen vyhodil.		Myslím, že ta funkce by měla brát **buď** automatickou anotaci **nebo** manuální, podle toho, co je k dispozici. Rovněž si teď myslím, že manuálně anotovaná data budeme používat minimálně - pouze pro změření úspěšnosti anotace pomocí hry - to ale nemusí být vůbec součástí skóre hry, to se udělá off-line. Manuálně anotovaných dat máme málo, jsou už anotovaná a nejsou zábavná. Z toho mi vyplývá, že bych manuální anotaci pro určování skóre nebral vůbec v úvahu a ze vzorečku nahoře bych první člen vyhodil.
	**^BH^**: Jirka ma pravdu. Pocitani skore musi byt objektivni. Proto jsem vzorecek upravila tak, ze nebude pocitat shodu hrace vzhledem k rucni anotaci (je-li k dispozici).		**^BH^**: Jirka ma pravdu. Pocitani skore musi byt objektivni. Proto jsem vzorecek upravila tak, ze nebude pocitat shodu hrace vzhledem k rucni anotaci (je-li k dispozici).
		+
	===== Output Data Needed =====		===== Output Data Needed =====
	* score list ## //player_id, pts, #sessions//		* score list ## //player_id, pts, #sessions//
-	* documents after the ''n''-th session consists of ''2*n'' players coreference annotation (some of them should be identical, the more identical the better)	+	* documents after the ''n''-th session consist of ''2*n'' players coreference annotation (some of them should be identical, the more identical the better)
	* session		* session
	* player_A_id, player_B_id		* player_A_id, player_B_id

---

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]