[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

[ Back to the navigation ]

You are here: start » user » zeman » treebanks » es

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
user:zeman:treebanks:es [2011/11/20 21:57]
zeman Sample. 		user:zeman:treebanks:es [2011/11/20 22:10] (current)
zeman Parsing results.
Line 291: Line 291:
 ==== Parsing ==== ==== Parsing ====
  
-Nonprojectivities in AnCora-CA are very rare. Only 487 of the 435,860 tokens in the CoNLL 2007 version are attached nonprojectively (0.11%). In the CoNLL 2009 version, there are no nonprojectivities at all.+In the CoNLL 2009 version, there are no nonprojectivities at all.
  
-The results of the CoNLL 2007 shared task are [[http://nextens.uvt.nl/depparse-wiki/AllScores|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/D/D07/D07-1096.pdf|(Nivre et al., 2007)]]. The evaluation procedure was changed to include punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Catalan:+The results of the CoNLL 2006 shared task are [[http://ilk.uvt.nl/conll/results.html|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W06/W06-2920.pdf|(Buchholz and Marsi, 2006)]]. The evaluation procedure was non-standard because it excluded punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Spanish:
  
 ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^ ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^
-| Titov et al. | 87.40 | 93.40 | +| MST (McDonald et al.) | 82.25 | 86.05 | 
-| Sagae | 88.16 | 93.34 | +| Nara (Cheng) | 80.46 | 85.15 | 
-| Malt (Nilsson et al.) | 88.70 | 93.12 | +| Microsoft (Corston-Oliver and Aue) | 80.36 | 84.87 | 
-| Nakagawa | 87.90 | 92.86 | +| Malt (Nivre et al.) | 81.29 | 84.67 | 
-| Carreras | 87.60 | 92.46 | +| Basis (O'Neil) | 79.82 | 84.11 |
-| Malt (Hall et al.) | 87.74 | 92.20 |+
  
-The two Malt parser results of 2007 (single malt and blended) are described in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/D/D07/D07-1097.pdf|(Hall et al., 2007)]] and the details about the parser configuration are described [[http://w3.msi.vxu.se/users/jha/conll07/|here]]. +The results of the CoNLL 2009 shared task are [[http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/conll2009-st/results/results.php|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology/W/W09/W09-1201.pdf|(Hajič et al., 2009)]]. Unlabeled attachment score was not published. These are the best results for Spanish:
- +
-The results of the CoNLL 2009 shared task are [[http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/conll2009-st/results/results.php|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology/W/W09/W09-1201.pdf|(Hajič et al., 2009)]]. Unlabeled attachment score was not published. These are the best results for Catalan:+
  
 ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^
-| Merlo | 87.86 | +| Merlo | 87.64 | 
-| Che | 86.56 | +| Che | 87.33 | 
-| Bohnet | 86.35 | +| Bohnet | 87.19 | 
-| Chen | 85.88 |+| Chen | 86.29 |
  

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]