Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- user:zeman:treebanks:ja [2012/01/04 09:45]
zeman Inside.
+++ user:zeman:treebanks:ja [2014/04/22 16:49] (current)
zeman Updated link.
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== Japanese (ja) =====
-[[http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/en/tuebajs.shtml|Tübingen Treebank of Spoken Japanese]] (TüBa-J/S, Verbmobil project)
+[[http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/en/ascl/resources/corpora/tueba-js.html|Tübingen Treebank of Spoken Japanese]] (TüBa-J/S, Verbmobil project)
 ==== Versions ====
@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 ==== Parsing ====
-Nonprojectivities in DDT are not frequent. Only 988 of the 100,238 tokens in the CoNLL 2006 version are attached nonprojectively (0.99%).
+Nonprojectivities in TüBa-J/S are not frequent. Only 1736 of the 157,172 tokens in the CoNLL 2006 version are attached nonprojectively (1.1%).
-The results of the CoNLL 2006 shared task are [[http://ilk.uvt.nl/conll/results.html|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W06/W06-2920.pdf|(Buchholz and Marsi, 2006)]]. The evaluation procedure was non-standard because it excluded punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Danish:
+The results of the CoNLL 2006 shared task are [[http://ilk.uvt.nl/conll/results.html|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W06/W06-2920.pdf|(Buchholz and Marsi, 2006)]]. The evaluation procedure was non-standard because it excluded punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Japanese:
 ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^
-| MST (McDonald et al.) | 84.79 | 90.58 |
+| Basis (John O'Neil) | 90.57 | 93.16 |
-| Malt (Nivre et al.) | 84.77 | 89.80 |
+| Nara (Yuchang Cheng) | 89.91 | 93.12 |
-| Riedel et al. | 83.63 | 89.66 |
+| Malt (Nivre et al.) | 91.65 | 93.10 |

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

Differences