[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki


[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
user:zeman:treebanks:ja [2012/01/04 09:45]
zeman Inside.
user:zeman:treebanks:ja [2014/04/22 16:49]
zeman Updated link.
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Japanese (ja) ===== ===== Japanese (ja) =====
  
-[[http://​www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/​en/​tuebajs.shtml|Tübingen Treebank of Spoken Japanese]] (TüBa-J/S, Verbmobil project)+[[http://​www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/​en/​ascl/​resources/​corpora/​tueba-js.html|Tübingen Treebank of Spoken Japanese]] (TüBa-J/S, Verbmobil project)
  
 ==== Versions ==== ==== Versions ====
Line 102: Line 102:
 ==== Parsing ==== ==== Parsing ====
  
-Nonprojectivities in DDT are not frequent. Only 988 of the 100,238 tokens in the CoNLL 2006 version are attached nonprojectively (0.99%).+Nonprojectivities in TüBa-J/​S ​are not frequent. Only 1736 of the 157,172 tokens in the CoNLL 2006 version are attached nonprojectively (1.1%).
  
-The results of the CoNLL 2006 shared task are [[http://​ilk.uvt.nl/​conll/​results.html|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://​aclweb.org/​anthology-new/​W/​W06/​W06-2920.pdf|(Buchholz and Marsi, 2006)]]. The evaluation procedure was non-standard because it excluded punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Danish:+The results of the CoNLL 2006 shared task are [[http://​ilk.uvt.nl/​conll/​results.html|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://​aclweb.org/​anthology-new/​W/​W06/​W06-2920.pdf|(Buchholz and Marsi, 2006)]]. The evaluation procedure was non-standard because it excluded punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Japanese:
  
 ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^ ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^
-MST (McDonald et al.) | 84.79 90.58 +Basis (John O'Neil) | 90.57 93.16 
-Malt (Nivre et al.) | 84.77 89.80 +Nara (Yuchang Cheng) | 89.91 93.12 
-Riedel ​et al. | 83.63 89.66 |+Malt (Nivre ​et al.91.65 93.10 |
  

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]