[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki

• ÚFAL Wiki Home
• ÚFAL Home
• Sitemap
• RSS
• ÚFAL calendar
• Recent changes
• Login
• Hledat:

[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

View differences: Side by SideInline Go

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision 2012/01/13 21:49 zeman Data split.2012/01/13 21:48 zeman 2012/01/13 21:48 zeman Parsing.2012/01/13 21:39 zeman Inside.2012/01/13 21:33 zeman Documentation.2012/01/13 18:13 zeman Inside.2012/01/13 18:04 zeman Sample.2012/01/13 18:00 zeman Domain and size.2012/01/13 17:49 zeman References.2012/01/13 17:49 zeman 2012/01/13 17:26 zeman vytvořeno Go Next revision		Previous revision 2012/01/13 21:49 zeman Data split.2012/01/13 21:48 zeman 2012/01/13 21:48 zeman Parsing.2012/01/13 21:39 zeman Inside.2012/01/13 21:33 zeman Documentation.2012/01/13 18:13 zeman Inside.2012/01/13 18:04 zeman Sample.2012/01/13 18:00 zeman Domain and size.2012/01/13 17:49 zeman References.2012/01/13 17:49 zeman 2012/01/13 17:26 zeman vytvořeno Go
user:zeman:treebanks:ru [2012/01/13 21:39] zeman Inside.		user:zeman:treebanks:ru [2012/01/13 21:49] (current) zeman Data split.
Line 80:		Line 80:
	==== Parsing ====		==== Parsing ====
-	BDT is a mildly nonprojective treebank. 1925 of the 151,604 tokens of combined BDT-II training and test sets are attached nonprojectively (1.27%).	+	Nonprojectivities in SynTagRus are not frequent. Only 4146 of the 497,465 tokens are attached nonprojectively (0.83%).
-	The results of the CoNLL 2007 shared task are [[http://nextens.uvt.nl/depparse-wiki/AllScores|available online]]. They have been published in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/D/D07/D07-1096.pdf|(Nivre et al., 2007)]]. The evaluation procedure was changed to include punctuation tokens. These are the best results for Basque:	+	Parsing results have been published by [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/C/C08/C08-1081.pdf|Nivre, Boguslavsky and Iomdin (2008)]] (note that they used different training-test data split from ours):
-	^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^	+	^ Parser ^ LAS ^ UAS ^
-	| Malt (Nilsson et al.) | 76.94 | 82.84 |	+	| Malt | 82.3 | 89.1 |
-	| Titov et al. | 75.49 | 81.93 |	+
-	| Sagae | 74.64 | 81.19 |	+
-	| Carreras | 75.75 | 81.11 |	+
-	| Nakagawa | 72.56 | 81.04 |	+
-	| Malt (J. Hall et al.) | 74.99 | 80.61 |	+
-	| Johansson et al. | 75.08 | 80.43 |	+
-	The two Malt parser results of 2007 (single malt and blended) are described in [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/D/D07/D07-1097.pdf|(Hall et al., 2007)]] and the details about the parser configuration are described [[http://w3.msi.vxu.se/users/jha/conll07/|here]].
-
-	Parsing results on BDT-II have been published in Kepa Bengoetxea, Koldo Gojenola: [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W10/W10-1404.pdf|Application of Different Techniques to Dependency Parsing of Basque]]. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages (SPMRL 2010), NAACL Workshop, Los Angeles, California, USA, 2010. They report only Labeled Attachment Score (LAS) and their best system achieved LAS = 78.98%.

---

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]