[ Skip to the content ]

Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Wiki


[ Back to the navigation ]

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
user:zeman:treebanks:te [2012/03/22 17:28]
zeman Sample.
user:zeman:treebanks:te [2012/03/22 18:18]
zeman Parsing.
Line 240: Line 240:
 ==== Parsing ==== ==== Parsing ====
  
-Nonprojectivities in HyDT-Bangla ​are not frequent. Only 78 of the 7252 chunks in the training+development ICON 2010 version are attached nonprojectively (1.08%).+Nonprojectivities in HyDT-Telugu ​are very rare. Only 13 of the 5722 chunks in the training+development ICON 2010 version are attached nonprojectively (0.23%).
  
-The results of the ICON 2009 NLP tools contest have been published in [[http://​ltrc.iiit.ac.in/​nlptools2009/​CR/​intro-husain.pdf|(Husain,​ 2009)]]. There were two evaluation rounds, the first with the coarse-grained syntactic tags, the second with the fine-grained syntactic tags. To reward language independence,​ only systems that parsed all three languages were officially ranked. The following table presents the Bengali/​coarse-grained results of the four officially ranked systems, and the best Bengali-only* system.+The results of the ICON 2009 NLP tools contest have been published in [[http://​ltrc.iiit.ac.in/​nlptools2009/​CR/​intro-husain.pdf|(Husain,​ 2009)]]. There were two evaluation rounds, the first with the coarse-grained syntactic tags, the second with the fine-grained syntactic tags. To reward language independence,​ only systems that parsed all three languages were officially ranked. The following table presents the Telugu/​coarse-grained results of the four officially ranked systems.
  
 ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^ ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^
-Kolkata ​(De et al.)84.29 90.32 +Malt (Nivre) | 62.44 86.28 
-Hyderabad (Ambati et al.) 78.25 90.22 +Mannem ​65.01 85.76 
-Malt (Nivre) | 76.07 88.97 +Hyderabad ​(Ambati et al.) | 65.01 85.25 
-| Malt+MST (Zeman) | 71.49 86.89 | +| Malt+MST (Zeman) | 56.43 81.30 |
-| Mannem | 70.34 | 83.56 |+
  
-The results of the ICON 2010 NLP tools contest have been published in [[http://​ltrc.iiit.ac.in/​nlptools2010/​files/​documents/​toolscontest10-workshoppaper-final.pdf|(Husain et al., 2010)]], page 6. These are the best results for Bengali ​with fine-grained syntactic tags:+The results of the ICON 2010 NLP tools contest have been published in [[http://​ltrc.iiit.ac.in/​nlptools2010/​files/​documents/​toolscontest10-workshoppaper-final.pdf|(Husain et al., 2010)]], page 6. These are the best results for Telugu ​with fine-grained syntactic tags:
  
 ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^ ^ Parser (Authors) ^ LAS ^ UAS ^
-Attardi ​et al. | 70.66 87.41 +Kosaraju ​et al. | 70.12 91.82 
-Kosaraju ​et al. | 70.55 86.16 +Attardi ​et al. | 65.61 90.48 
-| Kolachina et al. | 70.14 87.10 |+| Kolachina et al. | 68.11 90.15 |
  

[ Back to the navigation ] [ Back to the content ]