| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
user:zeman:treebanks:tr [2013/06/17 16:10]
zeman |
user:zeman:treebanks:tr [2014/04/22 17:01] (current)
zeman Updated link. |
| ===== Turkish (tr) ===== | ===== Turkish (tr) ===== |
| |
| [[http://www.ii.metu.edu.tr/content/treebank|METU-Sabanci Turkish Treebank]] (ODTÜ-Sabancı Türkçe Ağaç Yapılı Derlemi) | [[http://ii.metu.edu.tr/corpus|METU-Sabanci Turkish Treebank]] (ODTÜ-Sabancı Türkçe Ağaç Yapılı Derlemi) |
| |
| ==== Versions ==== | ==== Versions ==== |
| * Nart B. Atalay, Kemal Oflazer, Bilge Say: [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W03/W03-2405.pdf|The Annotation Process in the Turkish Treebank]]. In: Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora – LINC. Budapest, Hungary, 2003. | * Nart B. Atalay, Kemal Oflazer, Bilge Say: [[http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W03/W03-2405.pdf|The Annotation Process in the Turkish Treebank]]. In: Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora – LINC. Budapest, Hungary, 2003. |
| * Documentation | * Documentation |
| * Three PDF files are attached to the CoNLL version in the ''doc'' folder: ttbankkl.pdf (the chapter from Anne Abeillé, contains list of morphological tags), turkishtreebank.pdf (the paper from the EACL workshop) and user_guide.pdf (annotation manual for dependencies, in Turkish). | * Three PDF files are attached to the CoNLL version in the ''doc'' folder: {{:user:zeman:treebanks:ttbankkl.pdf|ttbankkl.pdf}} (the chapter from Anne Abeillé, contains list of morphological tags), turkishtreebank.pdf (the paper from the EACL workshop) and user_guide.pdf (annotation manual for dependencies, in Turkish). |
| |
| ==== Domain ==== | ==== Domain ==== |
| |
| There are special derivational nodes. Derived words have been split into several tokens (see also the sample below). Typical pattern (maybe the only pattern but I have not confirmed that) is as follows: There are two nodes connected with a dependency link. The head node corresponds to the surface word. It has the word form, part of speech and morphological features but it has no lemma (lemma is '_'). The surface word is a result of a derivational morphological process. It has been derived from another word, often a different part of speech (e.g. a noun was derived from a verb). The dependent node represents the source of the derivation. It has no word form but it has a lemma. Its part-of-speech tag describes the source word and thus it can differ from the part-of-speech tag of the head node. The FEAT column says just 'Pos'. The dependent node need not be a leave. Other nodes may depend on it, instead of depending on the parent node. If we have a noun derived from a verb, i.e. we have a verbal node depending on the nominal node, and there is a dependent filling a verbal valency slot of the derived noun, we can expect the dependent to be attached to the verbal node. | There are special derivational nodes. Derived words have been split into several tokens (see also the sample below). Typical pattern (maybe the only pattern but I have not confirmed that) is as follows: There are two nodes connected with a dependency link. The head node corresponds to the surface word. It has the word form, part of speech and morphological features but it has no lemma (lemma is '_'). The surface word is a result of a derivational morphological process. It has been derived from another word, often a different part of speech (e.g. a noun was derived from a verb). The dependent node represents the source of the derivation. It has no word form but it has a lemma. Its part-of-speech tag describes the source word and thus it can differ from the part-of-speech tag of the head node. The FEAT column says just 'Pos'. The dependent node need not be a leave. Other nodes may depend on it, instead of depending on the parent node. If we have a noun derived from a verb, i.e. we have a verbal node depending on the nominal node, and there is a dependent filling a verbal valency slot of the derived noun, we can expect the dependent to be attached to the verbal node. |
| | |
| | Occasionally there are derivational chains longer than two nodes. An example is in the sentence No. 82 of the test data: |
| | lemma azal / Verb -> _ / Verb / Caus -> _ / Verb / Pass|Pos -> azaltılması / Noun / NInf / A3sg|P3sg|Nom |
| | According to Google Translate, //azal// means “to decrease” and //azaltılması// means “reduced”. TRmorph gives the following four analyses: |
| | <code> |
| | analyze> azaltılması |
| | azal<v><caus><pass><vn_ma><p3s> |
| | azal<v><caus><pass><vn_ma><p3s><3s> |
| | azal<v><caus><pass><vn_ma><p3s><3p> |
| | azal<v><caus><pass><cv_ma><p3s> |
| | </code> |
| |
| ==== Sample ==== | ==== Sample ==== |
