Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
user:stranak:terminologie [2007/02/26 17:32] stranak |
user:stranak:terminologie [2012/09/05 23:34] (current) bejcek oprava wiki syntaxe |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Definice lingvistických termínů (či pokusy o ně) === | === Definice lingvistických termínů (či pokusy o ně) === | ||
== lexeme (lexém) == | == lexeme (lexém) == | ||
- | * The lexeme (word, phraseme, fixed word collocation) is a formal-semantic unit of the lexical level in its intersection with the semantic level. Its status is deep and hierarchical. We distinguish the lexeme-type on the level of abstraction and the lexeme-token (allolex) on the empirical level in context use. Thi use is either untypical and individual or usual, typical and reproduceable. On the level of abstraction, | + | * The lexeme (word, phraseme, fixed word collocation) is a formal-semantic unit of the lexical level in its intersection with the semantic level. Its status is deep and hierarchical. We distinguish the lexeme-type on the level of abstraction and the lexeme-token (allolex) on the empirical level in context use. The use is either untypical and individual or usual, typical and reproduceable. On the level of abstraction, |
< | < | ||
in: The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics, | in: The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics, | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== lexis == | == lexis == | ||
- | česky //nikoliv lexie, ale lexikum//! Tedy celá slovní zásoba daného jazyka. | + | česky //nikoliv lexie, ale lexikum//%%!%% Tedy celá slovní zásoba daného jazyka. |
== lexia == | == lexia == | ||
Toto je Filipcova //' | Toto je Filipcova //' | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Bridging Anaphora == | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, bridging is not a regular class, it seldom contains cases of associative and indirect anaphora (defined in the sequence) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Usually bridging anaphora considers two types: Associative anaphors are NPs that have an antecedent that is necessary to their interpretation (the relation between the anaphor and its antecedent is different from identity); and Indirect anaphor are those that have an identity relation with their antecedents but the anaphor and its antecedent have different headnouns. In both associative and indirect anaphora, the semantic relation holding between the anaphor and its antecedent play an essential role for resolution. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bridging is a referential phenomenon occurring when the referent of a linguistic expression can be determined only by recovering a meaningful implicit relation with an already mentioned entity or event. For example, in the following Italian sentences, the correct interpretation for // | ||
+ | |||
+ | ex. Un nuovo prestito obbligazionario al tasso del | ||
+ | 7% e della durata di tre anni verra emesso | ||
+ | domani dal Banco Ambroveneto, | ||
+ | richieste verranno accettate dal 2 al 14 ottobre. | ||
+ | [A new bond loan...will be issued tomorrow | ||
+ | by Banco Ambroveneto, | ||
+ | he accepted from the 2nd to the 14th of | ||
+ | October.] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// |